Re: DMVPN Replacement

Hey Keith,

?? Maybe that was what it was, the revision. I seen the GETVPN, but I noticed it said it was more of a complement than a replacement to DMVPN. Maybe I just misunderstood.

?? Thanks for the link.

Regards,

James

-----Original Message-----
From: Keith Barker <kbarker_at_ine.com>
To: armylegionmedic_at_aol.com
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Sent: Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:18 pm
Subject: Re: DMVPN Replacement

James-

Could they have been referencing DMVPN phase 3?

The newest buz on the security blueprint is GET VPN, (which does not
replace the functionality of DMVPN).

Sincerely,

PS- here is a post to a Blog regarding differences with DMVPN ver 1,
2 and 3
http://blog.internetworkexpert.com/2008/12/23/dmvpn-phase-3

Keith H. Barker, CCIE #6783
Senior CCIE Instructor
http://www.INE.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.
Toll Free: 877-224-8987
Outside US: 775-826-4344

On Sep 29, 2009, at 3:48 PM, armylegionmedic_at_aol.com wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
>
> ?? During Networkers on one of the sessions there was some mention
> that a new / newer technology was going to be basically moving
> towards replacing DMVPNs. It was supposed to be more efficient and
> work better. Does anyone happen to know what that was again?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> James
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Sep 29 2009 - 19:21:59 ART