Re: DMVPN Replacement

From: <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com>
Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2009 19:20:24 -0400

Great thank you very much for the reply. The only thing was I was reading over the description for it and seen that it says GETVPN is a complementary to DMVPN. I thought the guy from Networkers said the one I was trying to remember was a replacement. Maybe, I just misunderstood.

-----Original Message-----
From: Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
To: armylegionmedic_at_aol.com <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com>
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Tue, Sep 29, 2009 4:15 pm
Subject: Re: DMVPN Replacement

You may be thinking of GET VPNs.

Sent from handheld.

On Sep 29, 2009, at 6:50 PM, "armylegionmedic_at_aol.com" <armylegionmedic_at_aol.com
> wrote:

> Hello all,
>
>
>
> ?? During Networkers on one of the sessions there was some mention
> that a new / newer technology was going to be basically moving
> towards replacing DMVPNs. It was supposed to be more efficient and
> work better. Does anyone happen to know what that was again?
>
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
>
>
>
> James
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
 

> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Sep 29 2009 - 19:20:24 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:04 ART