Re: R&S 4.0 blueprint

From: <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Sep 2009 15:05:52 -0500

Some of this is actually serving my point. How deep can you get with a
ground up build out of a lab in 5.5 hours? Sure. It's the CCIE exam.
ANYTHING GOES. But I'm very curious how this will work out. Looking forward
to hearing feedback (non-NDA of course) from late Octobers first victims.
I'm not even scheduling a lab for V4 until I hear back from some survivors
(passed or not) on how it was.

Charles

                                                                                                                        
  From: Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                        
  To: Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
                                                                                                                        
  Cc: Christopher Copley <copley.chris_at_gmail.com>, michael haynes <mghaynes_at_gmail.com>,
              Charles.Henson_at_regions.com, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>, abderrahim sadki <a_sadki1_at_hotmail.com>,
              ccielab_at_groupstudy.com, iwan_at_ipexpert.com, jastorino_at_ipexpert.com, majonestx_at_gmail.com, Marko Milivojevic
              <markom_at_markom.info>, netwkengr_at_gmail.com, nobody_at_groupstudy.com, smorris_at_ine.com
                                                                                                                        
  Date: 09/14/2009 02:40 PM
                                                                                                                        
  Subject: Re: R&S 4.0 blueprint
                                                                                                                        

Ummm...

Unless you fail...

On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
wrote:
  Don't worry if you have done the right thing during your studies/Prep,
  you will pass with no problems, it will be ridiculously easy.

  On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Christopher Copley <
  copley.chris_at_gmail.com> wrote:
   This new trouble shoot section just made me think. Is it only going to
   be just trouble shooting IOS issues, or will they make you trouble shoot
   physical issue as well (i.e. disconnected cables, broken serial pins,
   etc). I am not 100% sure, but if my memory serves me I think that a
   CCIE friend of mine that passed the 2 day lab, said that they would make
   you trouble shoot physical issues as well.
   Any thoughts?

   Chris

   On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:43 PM, michael haynes <mghaynes_at_gmail.com>
   wrote:
     My wife and I often say to each other we wish Cisco would bring back
     the two day lab. Yes, it would be a bit more painful to go through
     for the student, a bit more painful for the proctor to grade and
     participate in, but I don't think there'd be much discussion that the
     candidate knew what they were talking about.

     This new troubleshooting portion just doesn't have the same glamour as
     the old test ;)

     Michael

     On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 1:35 PM, <Charles.Henson_at_regions.com> wrote:
      I think it's funny how this thread is pretty clear that with the
      breadth of
      features and functions you could be tested on and the new timeline
      you have
      given the troubleshooting portion that the "depth" of each area will
      be
      "basic". I agree that there is so much to cover and not enough time
      to pack
      it all in to one 8 hour test. I also agree that anyone passing the
      4.0 lab
      still should be respected. But you have to admit the irony of a CCIE
      (EXPERT) groupstudy lab discussion pointing out the "basic" depth of
      features and technologies.

      Anyone for bringing back the two day lab? :) I kid I kid... Let me
      pass
      first....

      Charles From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> To:
      Narbik Kocharians <narbikk_at_gmail.com> Cc: Marko Milivojevic <
      markom_at_markom.info>, abderrahim sadki <a_sadki1_at_hotmail.com>,
      netwkengr_at_gmail.com, jastorino_at_ipexpert.com,
      darby.weaver_at_gmail.com, smorris_at_ine.com, majonestx_at_gmail.com,
      iwan_at_ipexpert.com,
                   copley.chris_at_gmail.com, ccielab_at_groupstudy.com

       Date: 09/14/2009 11:52 AM

       Subject: Re: R&S 4.0 blueprint

      Things get even more fun when you add / combine / cloud / muddy up
      the
      waters by including port security and dot1x ...

      lol ...

      Yep, not much here. "nothing to see folks, move along"

      On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:24 PM, Narbik Kocharians
      <narbikk_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> hahahaha they should add some more
>
> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 8:33 AM, Marko Milivojevic <
      markom_at_markom.info
> >wrote:
>
> > On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 13:10, abderrahim sadki <
      a_sadki1_at_hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > I have a silly question.
> > >
> > > should we focus our studies according to the blueprint ? As
      when I
> > looked
> > > at it , I don' t see much of layer 2 technology for example.
> >
> > If we exclude:
> >
> > 1.00 Implement Layer 2 Technologies
> >
> > 1.10 Implement Spanning Tree Protocol (STP)
> > (a) 802.1d
> > (b) 802.1w
> > (c) 801.1s
> > (d) Loop guard
> > (e) Root guard
> > (f) Bridge protocol data unit (BPDU) guard
> > (g) Storm control
> > (h) Unicast flooding
> > (i) Port roles, failure propagation, and loop guard operation
> >
> > 1.20 Implement VLAN and VLAN Trunking Protocol (VTP)
> >
> > 1.30 Implement trunk and trunk protocols, EtherChannel, and
> load-balance
> >
> > 1.40 Implement Ethernet technologies
> > (a) Speed and duplex
> > (b) Ethernet, Fast Ethernet, and Gigabit Ethernet
> > (c) PPP over Ethernet (PPPoE)
> >
> > 1.50 Implement Switched Port Analyzer (SPAN), Remote Switched
      Port
> > Analyzer (RSPAN), and flow control
> >
> > 1.60 Implement Frame Relay
> > (a) Local Management Interface (LMI)
> > (b) Traffic shaping
> > (c) Full mesh
> > (d) Hub and spoke
> > (e) Discard eligible (DE)
> >
> > 1.70 Implement High-Level Data Link Control (HDLC) and PPP
> >
> >
> > you are quite right - there are not that many left :-)
> >
> > --
> > Marko
> > CCIE #18427 (SP)
> > My network blog: http://cisco.markom.info/
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Narbik Kocharians
> CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
> www.MicronicsTraining.com
> Sr. Technical Instructor
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
      _______________________________________________________________________

> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

      --
      Andrew Lee Lissitz
      all.from.nj_at_gmail.com

      Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

      _______________________________________________________________________

      Subscription information may be found at:
      http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

      Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net

      _______________________________________________________________________

      Subscription information may be found at:
      http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

  --
  Narbik Kocharians
  CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
  www.MicronicsTraining.com
  Sr. Technical Instructor

--
Darby Weaver
Network Engineer
407-802-7394
darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 14 2009 - 15:05:52 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART