Re: EIGRP summary address problem

From: Steve Lyons <charter21p5_at_gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 13 Sep 2009 11:17:05 -0400

Andy,
Send your configuration to the group and the sh ip route output. I would
like to see what is configured.

Steve Lyons

On Sun, Sep 13, 2009 at 11:13 AM, Andy Reid <ccie_at_reid.it> wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I am experiencing an unexpected problem when configuring an EIGRP summary
> address on the interface of R6 which is connected to BB3.
>
> The problem is that any summary address except for 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 is not
> sent by R6 to BB3. I have a couple of /32 loopback addresses in the routing
> table of R6 and I am trying to advertise them as a summary address /16. I
> have even tried adding a default route for the /16 network to null0 on R6,
> yet it is still not advertised to BB3.
>
> Are there any caveats to using a summary-address on an interface for EIGRP?
> and why does a default summary route work when all others don't?
>
> Yours frustrated, Andy
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Sep 13 2009 - 11:17:05 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART