Re: MSDP verification

Thanks.

The 'bleeding over' of auto-rp was a concern for me since the lab specified
I had to use sparse-dense mode.

On one side I configured w/ the bsr border command to stop bsr ... and on
the other side I forgot how to stop auto-rp. I was trying to get the lab
done within the time allotted.

I have since gone back and saw the filter-autorp command ... good call
Bryan. Thanks.

On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Andrew,
>
> Yes, that is the way to test :-) Also, make use some type of boundary to
> prevent RP leakage from AS to the other. Just because you configure BSR and
> Auto-RP does not mean each AS won't learn RP information from the other
> side.
>
> On Sat, Sep 12, 2009 at 11:00 AM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Hello Team,
>>
>> Quick question
>>
>> - to verify my msdp configs, is this a valid test? I think it is since I
>> can see active mcast groups being populated across msdp peers ...
>>
>> 1) Configured both RPs in each of their AS.
>> 2) Configure the msdp peers and verify these are up
>> 3) Add a group in one AS (and then the second)
>> 4) ping the mcast group from the local AS
>> 5) ping the mcast group from the remote AS
>>
>> To have more fun ... I configured the first AS to use auto-rp, and the
>> second AS to use BSR. I did not want anything to be 'auto-magic' ...
>>
>> Any thoughts team?
>>
>> --
>> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net