Thanks Ryan , I didn't see any shaping on the LAN Side before but it makes
sence...I didn't think about it from saving the router resources its always
saving the Link BW..
so best option that the provider is the one dropping which what happens in
Real life if you pay for the classification and marking
----- Original Message -----
From: "Ryan West" <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
To: "Mohamed El Henawy" <m.henawy_at_link.net>; "ccIE Groupstudy"
<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Thursday, September 10, 2009 12:00 AM
Subject: RE: QOS , NBAR.etc..limit internet traffic
Mohammed,
You're right, it won't help with the immediate stream of packets, but if
you're policing inbound, it will start back off and that will clear up the
line for more inbound packets. You can also identify streams of a traffic
that you would like to slow down and apply shaping inbound towards your LAN
to produce similar results. The main issue with the later is that you're
using router resources to slow the traffic down. If you can get the
cooperation of your provider, that would be your best bet, but they
typically want extra dollars for that.
-ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Mohamed El Henawy
Sent: Wednesday, September 09, 2009 3:46 PM
To: ccIE Groupstudy
Subject: QOS , NBAR.etc..limit internet traffic
Hello Group ,
I have always had this question about limiting internet traffic...I
understand
that most likely we need to limit the download ( incoming traffic )
however..if we are going to apply it on the incoming direction on the wan
interface of the CE ( nothing on PE yet ).I take this from exam point of
view
...how this is going to help save the Link BW ? data is already downloaded
and
we are dropping or policing only at the end point..on the other hand if we
put
it on the outgoing direction then we only limit the upload....
can anyone help with this plz
Thanks :)
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Sep 09 2009 - 23:39:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:03 ART