Re: Full reachability in the Real Lab

From: Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>
Date: Mon, 7 Sep 2009 09:36:20 -0500

Awesome Darby and thank you for clarifying

Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan

On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 9:12 AM, Darby Weaver <darby.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> I guess without defying the NDA, the correct answer is a firm "It depends".
>
> Example: You may or may not have to have full reachability to your
> BackBone.
>
> Example: BGP may or may not have to have full reachability within your pod
> but may or may not need to have neighbor relationships with other devices.
>
> The list goes on...
>
>
>
>
> On Mon, Sep 7, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi All,
>>
>> If the answer is not Violating NDA,kindly let me know your comments.I
>> have
>> heard much emphasis about full reachability in the real lab.Is full
>> reachability is always a requirement or do I have to assume even otherwise
>> asked for to get full reachability or it should be a question for the
>> proctor.Kindly let me know.
>>
>> Thanks for the help
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Darby Weaver
> Network Engineer
>
> 407-802-7394
> darbyweaver_at_yahoo.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Sep 07 2009 - 09:36:20 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART