Re: Lab duct tape

From: Mohamed El Henawy <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Date: Sat, 5 Sep 2009 17:44:56 +0300

Thanks Anthony , Clear like crystal

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Sequeira" <asequeira_at_ine.com>
To: "Mohamed El Henawy" <m.henawy_at_link.net>
Cc: "Mark Matters" <markccie_at_gmail.com>; <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:31 PM
Subject: Re: Lab duct tape

> It has always been my belief that the Grading Script and the Proctor
> are smart enough to ensure you lose these "cascading" points.
>
> So - if RA and RB do not have connectivity, you lose on anything in
> the future that "should" rely on such connectivity.
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
> http://www.INE.com
>
> Test your Core Knowledge today!
> Q: How many seconds does it take for the classic STP protocol to
> recover from a direct link failure with the default timer values?
> A: 30
> More Info:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk389/tk621/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094954.shtml
>
>
> On Sep 5, 2009, at 10:27 AM, Mohamed El Henawy wrote:
>
>> As we are speaking about what happen if...
>>
>> if there is no ping between RA & RB and there is qos question
>> that is related to the path bet A & B...if I do it right that still
>> counted right ???
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anthony Sequeira" <asequeira_at_ine.com
>> >
>> To: "Mark Matters" <markccie_at_gmail.com>
>> Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Sent: Saturday, September 05, 2009 6:20 PM
>> Subject: Re: Lab duct tape
>>
>>
>>> Awesome thinking...at times we might have to apply "duct tape" in
>>> order to keep on moving and collecting other points.
>>>
>>> I would make one comment here, however. When I was doing this, I
>>> never, ever violated any of the initial Do's and Dont's of the lab
>>> exam. So from your list below, I would NEVER do a static route in the
>>> lab exam, unless explicitly instructed that I could. I am not sure
>>> what happens when you violate those initial instructions, but I never
>>> wanted to find out. :-)
>>>
>>> Warmest Regards,
>>>
>>> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
>>> http://www.INE.com
>>>
>>> Test your Core Knowledge today!
>>> Q: The multicast source is located behind R5. Which router will flood
>>> multicast over the shared VLAN 146 segment?
>>> A: R4
>>> More Info:
>>> http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/99mar/I-D/draft-ietf-pim-v2-dm-01.txt
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sep 5, 2009, at 11:11 AM, Mark Matters wrote:
>>>
>>>> Here are some items that you can duct tape and move on so you can
>>>> finish the
>>>> lab. Then go back and start fixing things? What do you think?
>>>>
>>>> 1. etherchannels - duct tape = trunks
>>>> 2. redistribution - duct tape = unfiltered redistribution
>>>> 3. igp - duct tape = static route
>>>> 4. multicast - duct tape = ip mroute
>>>> 5. security - duct tape = no security
>>>> 6. qos - duct tape = no qos
>>>> 7. bgp - duct tape = plain old ibgp and ebgp
>>>>
>>>> Are a few points worth an hour to get working?
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> -
>>>> "The more I learn the less I know".
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> --------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> No virus found in this incoming message.
>> Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
>> Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date:
>> 09/04/09 05:51:00
>>
>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

No virus found in this incoming message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 8.5.409 / Virus Database: 270.13.76/2345 - Release Date: 09/04/09
05:51:00

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Sep 05 2009 - 17:44:56 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sun Oct 04 2009 - 07:42:02 ART