Re: Etherchannel XOR on 3 and 5 ports etherchannel

Hans,
though this is not the answer to your question however, if you have two
switches available then you may try to create a channel of odd# of ports and
use "test etherchannel load-balance" cmd to findout what port is choosen.

On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 9:28 AM, ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Good morning,
>
> You kind of lost me here ... are you using a packet sniffer or wondering
> how
> IOS works beneath the user shell?
>
> Do you have a config question or are you labbing something up?
>
> Perhaps I have not looked at etherchannel in the same way you are doing in
> your email, please explain more.
>
> Kindest regards and have a great day,
>
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2009 at 5:23 AM, Hans Eriksson <eriksson.hans_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > I have no problem understanding this when using Etherchannel with 2,4 or
> 8
> > ports in a bundel. But if you have 5 or 7 ports in the bundel.
> > Exampel from Cisco.
> >
> > 192.168.10.1 and 172.24.50.6
> >
> > 1 = 00000001 and 6 = 00000110
> >
> > 2 port etherchannel port (0-1) 1XOR0 =1 eq port 1
> > 4 port etherchannel port (0-3) 01XOR10 = 11 eq port 3
> > 8 port etherchannel port (0-7) 001XIR110 = 111 eq port 7
> >
> > now if you have 5 or 5 porst what happends?
> > What bits are used?
> >
> > 3 port channel port (0-2)
> > or
> > 5 port channel port (0-4)
> >
> > How will this work?
> >
> > Regards Hasse
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Andrew Lee Lissitz
> all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Sep 03 2009 - 10:34:35 ART