Re: Two silly questions

I've never heard of that options. Although, if you need to do it in an
uncommon way database filters come to mind. The extranet thing only
requires two entities to connect over public infrastructure in the same
manner they would over the internet without having their resources
available to the internet at large. In other words if the Post office and
UPS both had Verizon MPLS and they requested to be overlapped with each
other that would pretty much do it. You could technically do it using
general internet and then craft firewall rules to allow access from
certain sources only. Where did these questions come from anyway?

Re: Two silly questions

William McCall
to:
Keegan.Holley
08/26/09 01:01 AM

Cc:
Cisco certification

Cool responses. For the NSSA no-summary, is there *any* other way than
a totally NSSA to do this? I got told something I found kind of
ridiculous. (something about creating an NSSA with some unheard of
option of allow default only or similar)

As for the extranet, I'm guessing that an enterprise performing
route-leaking between VRFs would still qualify as the same technology
but maybe a different term than "extranet"?

In any case, the question is more or less answered, but I had to pick
the brains of the masters.

William McCall
CCIE #25044 (R&S)

On Tue, Aug 25, 2009 at 10:51 PM, <Keegan.Holley_at_sungard.com> wrote:
> 1) area x nssa no-summary on all the ABR's.
>
> 2) This one is kind of vague. An extranet is any network that connects
more
> than one company but does not use the "internet". You can have an
extranet
> in a single vpn or using a series of overlaps. Let me know if I'm
missing
> something.
>
>
>
> Two silly questions
> William McCall to: Cisco certification
> 08/25/09 08:10 PM
> Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> Please respond to William McCall
>
>
> ________________________________
>
>
> I received two questions today (no, not on the exam, so quit crying NDA)
>
> 1) In an NSSA, what methods can you use to limit the routes to 7's and
> a default route
> 2) Is route leaking in MPLS effectively the same as providing
"extranet"?
>
> I already have some answers I gave.. and I believe them to be right,
> but I was corrected.
>
> Give me your best, experts!
>
> William McCall
> CCIE #25044 (R&S)
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at
> http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Aug 26 2009 - 11:01:16 ART