With the first option all routes advertised in area 2 like summaries will
get a cost of 500. With that new configuration only the default that's
advertised will get that cost.
-- Regards, Rick Mur CCIE2 #21946 (R&S / Service Provider) Juniper JNCIA-ER & JNCIA-EX MCSA:Messaging, MCSE Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc. URL: http://www.IPexpert.com On Thu, Aug 20, 2009 at 12:21 PM, <mihai.grigore_at_orange-ftgroup.com> wrote: > Fellow experts, > > I am trying to find out if there is any difference in setting the cost of > the > default route injected in the NSSA area. I used the following 2 > configurations > and I can see no difference in the LSA. Here we go: > > first option: > ========== > router ospf 1 > area 2 nssa default-information-originate > area 2 default-cost 500 > > second option: > ============ > router ospf 1 > area 2 nssa default-information-originate metric 500 > > > In both cases, I can see the same metric in the Type-7 LSA: > > Rack1SW3#sh ip o da nssa-external 0.0.0.0 > > OSPF Router with ID (150.1.9.9) (Process ID 1) > > Type-7 AS External Link States (Area 2) > > Routing Bit Set on this LSA > LS age: 388 > Options: (No TOS-capability, No Type 7/5 translation, DC) > LS Type: AS External Link > Link State ID: 0.0.0.0 (External Network Number ) > Advertising Router: 150.1.3.3 > LS Seq Number: 80000003 > Checksum: 0x1FFD > Length: 36 > Network Mask: /0 > Metric Type: 2 (Larger than any link state path) > TOS: 0 > Metric: 500 <<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<<< > Forward Address: 0.0.0.0 > External Route Tag: 0 > > > I guess there is no difference, the first configuration is the legacy while > the > second one is the newer way to configure it. > > Thanx, best regards, Mihai > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net > > _______________________________________________________________________ > Subscription information may be found at: > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Thu Aug 20 2009 - 12:49:33 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Tue Sep 01 2009 - 05:43:57 ART