RE: FR link efficiency

I have R1 and R2 connected via FR. The task says configure QoS on R1 such
that there is a guarantee latency Bw of 256k and queue 320k. Since, the task
is under QoS - Frame Relay I configured as below.-Yuri

> To: ebay_products_at_hotmail.com; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: FR link efficiency
> From: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
> Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2009 02:43:06 +0000
>
> Well frame-relay fragment 320 will just fragment frames larger than 320
bytes. What exactly does the task say?
> ------Original Message------
> From: Cisco Fanatic
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> To: CCIE Groupstudy
> ReplyTo: Cisco Fanatic
> Subject: FR link efficiency
> Sent: Aug 14, 2009 9:31 PM
>
> All,
>
> If we have to configure FR Link Efficiency between R1 and R2 (say), where a
> guarantee latency Bandwidth is 256k and the queue is 320k.
>
> !
> interface Serial0/0/0
> ip address 10.10.10.10 255.255.255.0
> encapsulation frame-relay
> frame-relay class QoS
> frame-relay traffic-shaping
> frame-relay map ip 10.10.10.20 102 broadcast
> no frame-relay inverse-arp
> !
> map-class frame-relay QoS
> frame-relay fragment 320
> frame-relay traffic-rate 256000 256000
> frame-relay fair-queue
> !
> Is my interpretation correct?
>
> -Yuri
>
>
>
> _________________________________________________________________
> Get your vacation photos on your phone!
> http://windowsliveformobile.com/en-us/photos/default.aspx?&OCID=0809TL-HM
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Received on Fri Aug 14 2009 - 19:48:07 ART