Re: would you get points when you don't get full IP

From: Alan Ewer <acewer64_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Jul 2009 12:28:47 +1000

Hi GreenPackets..

I believe that you would get the points for the stuff that doestnt require
reachability as has previously said. However without full reachability you
will have trouble getting any points for multicast and BGP in all
probability..

As a strategic point ... if the solution requested multiple point
redistribution... and you cant resolve a routing loop ... then i would trash
the points and reduce the solution to a working solution of single point
reachability .. but have full reachability .... as the dependencies on full
reachability are pretty big ticket items in the lab when you stand to loose
so many points on at least BGP and MCAST and whatever else !!

Best regds
Alan E

On 7/29/09, Persio Pucci <persio_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'd say you would loose points if one of the task requires you to have
> complete reachability. If you don't you'd loose that taks's points,
> considering everything else is working (even though something should not).
>
> On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Green Packets <greenpackets_at_gmail.com
> >wrote:
>
> > Group,
> > I wonder whether you'd get points for non-core tasks that you did (e.g.
> > QoS,
> > Security, IP Services) when you don't get full IP reachability ("the
> golden
> > moment") ?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 29 2009 - 12:28:47 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART