appreciated joe
Regards
Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:15 PM, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
> Yes, you should see a priority of 0. I just tested this myself actually.
>
>
> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:57 PM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Joe,
>>
>> Thanks for the reply ..Also you agreeing that the priority field on the
>> show ip ospf neighbor should be 0 ?
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Regards
>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:53 PM, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>>
>>> Yes, with an OSPF network type of point-to-point you have no concept of a
>>> DR.
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 3:31 PM, Anantha Subramanian Natarajan <
>>> anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the response gary
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 2:29 PM, Gary Duncanson <
>>>> gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> > Anantha,
>>>> >
>>>> > Seems fair to me although I must say I haven't checked. I believe the
>>>> > default is one where DR/BDR is actually required.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Gary
>>>> > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Anantha Subramanian Natarajan" <
>>>> > anantha.natarajan_at_gravitant.com>
>>>> > To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>>>> > Sent: Monday, July 27, 2009 7:47 PM
>>>> > Subject: ip ospf network type point-to-point on farme-relay
>>>> >
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi All,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> I have a question on when we run ip ospf network type point-to-point
>>>> on a
>>>> >> physical frame-relay interface.The question is,when the OSPF neighbor
>>>> >> adjacency comes up,the o/p of "show ip ospf neighbor" priority field
>>>> shows
>>>> >> "0".I am assuming because since there is not a concept of DR/BDR on
>>>> this
>>>> >> network type.Is this understanding right.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> In one of my labworkbook output,I see the o/p had priority of 1 on
>>>> the
>>>> >> "show
>>>> >> ip ospf neighbor" for the above networktype and topology.So,I just
>>>> want to
>>>> >> verify my understanding and hopefully not missing something basic.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Thanks for the assistance.
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Regards
>>>> >> Anantha Subramanian Natarajan
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> >> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> >> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Regards,
>>>
>>> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
>>> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
>>> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
>>> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
>>> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
>>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino - CCIE #24347 R&S
> Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
> Cell: +1.586.212.6107
> Fax: +1.810.454.0130
> Mailto: jastorino_at_ipexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jul 27 2009 - 15:17:36 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART