RE: BSR question.......

From: Rana Bilal <rab_91_at_hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:20:59 +0000

Guys.........Just got it working.........I was running MPLS traffic
engineering tunnel between the three routers, and I was getting PRF failure on
the lo0 interfaces used for BSR. My routers were not getting any thing from
show ip pim rp mapping command and show ip igmp groups was not showing the
groups.

I configred the multicast static routes between my candidate RP and BSR
candidate and I'm able to ping the group address.

But thanks for your time and brain storming.

Here is the scenario R1 (candidate RP)--------> R2(using igmp joing
group)------------>R3 (bsr candidate)

                                      ==========Traffic Engineering Tunnel
====================>

~Ahmad Bilal

> Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 09:51:42 -0700
> From: ripperthejack2001_at_yahoo.com
> Subject: Re: BSR question.......
> To: bbartik_at_ipexpert.com
> CC: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com; asequeira_at_ine.com; rab_91_at_hotmail.com
>
> I stand corrected, thanks, Bryan, some quick reading and I realized BSR
updates are sent unicast, not multicast.
>
> Thanks,
> Craig
>
> --- On Thu, 7/23/09, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
> > Subject: Re: BSR question.......
> > To: "Craig Miller" <ripperthejack2001_at_yahoo.com>
> > Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com, asequeira_at_ine.com, "Rana Bilal"
<rab_91_at_hotmail.com>
> > Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 11:45 AM
> > Hello,
> >
> > 224.0.1.39 and 224.0.1.40 are for Auto-RP, not BSR. Start
> > with the basics...
> >
> > show ip pim neighbor
> > show ip pim rp mapping
> >
> > Are there PIM adjacencies to each device? Is the RP
> > information getting propagated? Do you have PIM enabled on
> > the interface that has the join?
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Jul 23, 2009 at 10:31 AM,
> > Craig Miller <ripperthejack2001_at_yahoo.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > I think your problem is the sparse-mode configuration, your
> > RP and BSR haven't learned about each other because of
> > the sparse-mode, sparse dense mode would resolve that,
> > because the dense mode would allow the the 224.0.1.39 and
> > 224.0.1.40 traffic to flood to and from the BSR.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Multicasting is probably my weakest area at the moment, so
> > I hope this helps point you in the right direction.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- On Thu, 7/23/09, Rana Bilal <rab_91_at_hotmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > > From: Rana Bilal <rab_91_at_hotmail.com>
> >
> > > Subject: BSR question.......
> >
> > > To: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com,
> > asequeira_at_ine.com
> >
> > > Date: Thursday, July 23, 2009, 11:19 AM
> >
> > > Hi Experts,
> >
> > >
> >
> > > My
> >
> > > question is related to BSR candidate impelmentation on
> > a
> >
> > > network. Lets say I have 3 routers running PIM sparse
> > mode
> >
> > > and I'm planning to
> >
> > > make one router as rp candidate and 2nd one as the
> > bsr
> >
> > > candidate. I'm doing an
> >
> > > IGMP join on one of the interfaces of the third
> > router. But
> >
> > > not able to ping
> >
> > > that group from any of the three routers in sparse
> > mode
> >
> > > domain. How ever when
> >
> > > I make my first router both as rp candiate and bsr
> >
> > > candidate, I'm able to ping
> >
> > > the multicast group address. Does any one knows why
> > this is
> >
> > > happening, or is
> >
> > > it mandatory to have rp candiate and bsr candidate
> >
> > > configured on the same
> >
> > > router in order for the multicast to work properly.
> > Any
> >
> > > help will be
> >
> > > appreciated.....
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > ~Ahmad Bilal
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > _________________________________________________________________
> >
> > > Show them the way! Add maps and directions to your
> > party
> >
> > > invites.
> >
> > > http://www.microsoft.com/windows/windowslive/products/events.aspx
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> >
> > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > >
> >
> > >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > > Subscription information may be found at:
> >
> > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> >
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> >
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Bryan Bartik
> > CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> > Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> > URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Received on Thu Jul 23 2009 - 17:20:59 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:23 ART