Re: MQC FRTS

Ryan,

With first scenario ( without nested policy-map), sho policy-map int s1/0
does not gave any output.
See output from second scenario ( with nested policy-map),

R1#sho policy-map int s1/0
 Serial1/0: DLCI 105 -

  Service-policy output: FRTS

    Class-map: class-default (match-any)
      0 packets, 0 bytes
      5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
      Match: any
      Traffic Shaping
           Target/Average Byte Sustain Excess Interval Increment
             Rate Limit bits/int bits/int (ms) (bytes)
           128000/128000 1984 7936 7936 62 992

        Adapt Queue Packets Bytes Packets Bytes Shaping
        Active Depth Delayed Delayed Active
        - 0 0 0 0 0 no

      Service-policy : VOICE

        Class-map: VOICE (match-all)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: protocol rtp
          Queueing
            Strict Priority
            Output Queue: Conversation 24
            Bandwidth 24 (kbps) Burst 600 (Bytes)
            (pkts matched/bytes matched) 0/0
            (total drops/bytes drops) 0/0

        Class-map: class-default (match-any)
          0 packets, 0 bytes
          5 minute offered rate 0 bps, drop rate 0 bps
          Match: any
R1#

 Molomo

On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 8:02 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> You are correct, can you post the output from your sh policy-map int
> s1/0? Whats different?
>
>
>
> -ryan
>
>
>
> *From:* Molomo [mailto:letjedilakopa_at_gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Tuesday, July 21, 2009 1:57 PM
> *To:* Ryan West
> *Cc:* ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> *Subject:* Re: MQC FRTS
>
>
>
> Ryan,
> My understanding is that frame-relay traffic-shaping can only be used with
> GTS and Legacy FRTS not MQC FRTS.
>
> I'll lab and see.
>
> Rdgs,
> Molomo
>
> On Tue, Jul 21, 2009 at 6:47 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
>
> Frame-relay traffic-shaping on the interface.
>
> Sent from handheld.
>
>
> On Jul 21, 2009, at 12:40 PM, "Molomo" <letjedilakopa_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Group,
> >
> > I have labbed the two scenarios below and scenario 1 is not giving
> > me any
> > output when I run *sh policy-map int s1/0* . I expected to get the
> > same
> > result. What am I missing,
> >
> > ------Scenario 1---------------
> >
> > class-map match-all VOICE
> > match protocol rtp
> >
> > policy-map FRTS
> > class VOICE
> > priority 64
> > class class-default
> > shape average 128000
> >
> > map-class frame-relay DLCI_105
> > service-policy output FRTS
> >
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.5 105 br
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 105
> > class DLCI_105
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > end
> >
> > ----------Scenario 2 -----------------
> >
> > class-map match-all VOICE
> > match protocol rtp
> >
> > policy-map VOICE
> > class VOICE
> > priority 64
> > class class-default
> >
> > policy-map FRTS
> > class class-default
> > shape average 128000
> > service-policy VOICE
> >
> > map-class frame-relay DLCI_105
> > service-policy output FRTS
> >
> > interface Serial1/0
> > ip address 10.0.0.1 255.255.255.0
> > encapsulation frame-relay
> > frame-relay map ip 10.0.0.5 105 br
> > frame-relay interface-dlci 105
> > class DLCI_105
> > no frame-relay inverse-arp
> > end
> >
> >
>
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
>
>
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jul 21 2009 - 20:13:14 ART