Re: OT:SPA ERROR

Hey JD,

Although there exists only a single character of difference between
the "-L" and the "-WL" variants, they appear to be somewhat different
SPAs:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps6267/product_data_sheet0900aecd804dc62d.html

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/modules/ps6267/product_data_sheet0900aecd80715dc5.html

And I don't see the "-WL" as being supported by the SIP-601:

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/prod/collateral/routers/ps167/product_data_sheet0900aecd80465682.html

I am by no stretch of the imagination a 12k expert but I have been
looking at some of these little nuances in recent days for an upcoming
project. Based on the above data sheets, this might warrant looking
into a little closer (unless you're just 100% that this is a valid
combination).

Love what you're doing with that Tennessee bourbon, BTW (although if I
could persuade you to kick it back up to 90 proof that would be really
wonderful)....

Regards,

Scott

On Jul 20, 2009, at 10:31 , jack daniels wrote:

> Hi group,
>
> I have a queery . I have a card SPA-1X10GE-WL-V2 and I'm instling
> the same
> into SIP-601 of 12416 chassis. IOS version is c12kprp-k4p-mz.
> 120-32.SY6.
>
> But this SPA is not getting detected it gives error -
>
> Router#
> SLOT 15:00:01:38: %EE192-5-LC_INVALID_SPACONFIG: Invalid SPA
> configuration
> for l
> inecard in slot 1340:
> Invalid spa type when getting the spa power.
> SLOT 15:00:01:38: %EE192-5-LC_EXCEED_POWER: Line Card exceeds total
> power
> allowe
> d in slot 15
>
>
> Please suggest if someone has faced this issue
>
> Thanks and Regards
> J.Daniels
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jul 20 2009 - 11:30:59 ART