Re: Route Redistribution - Do and Don't?

From what I see in the ASET LABs

this part is clear they always tell you what exactly they want you to
redistribute and which routes you should be seeing
I think the full reachability is not a must unless they state that
IE Worbooks are all about making you ready for everything

----- Original Message -----
From: "Anthony Sequeira" <asequeira_at_ine.com>
To: "Anh Khoa Le Viet" <lvakhoa_at_gmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2009 7:24 PM
Subject: Re: Route Redistribution - Do and Don't?

> The actual CCIE labs feature a lot of variety from one to the next. This
> is, of course, to help protect the integrity of the program.
>
> One of the areas you can see much variety in is the area of
> redistribution. Here are just a few possibilities off of the top of my
> head:
>
> 1 - You are told at the beginning of the lab that all prefixes in the lab
> scenario must be fully reachable.
>
> 2 - You are presented with a defined redistribution section that leaves
> it open how redistribution should be implemented.
>
> 3 - You are presented with a redistribution section and this section
> includes detailed instructions on redistribution.
>
> Notice that in all cases - you need to read the ENTIRE lab exam very
> carefully, and do exactly what they instruct in order to receive your
> points. Also, like Bruce tends to say over at NMC, "make no assumptions".
> Just because our labs at INE tend to all feature and focus on full
> reachability, do not make such an assumption in the actual CCIE lab. In
> the lab, do what they (implicitly or explicitly) require and collect your
> points and then move on in your career. :-)
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
> http://www.INE.com
>
> Test your Core Knowledge today!
> Q: Four NAT terms are used to describe IP addresses in a NAT scenario.
> The address of an internal corporate system as known to an Internet host
> is typically referred to as which term?
> A: The Inside Global Address
> More Info:
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/tech/tk648/tk361/technologies_tech_note09186a0080094831.shtml
>
> On Jul 18, 2009, at 11:31 AM, Anh Khoa Le Viet wrote:
>
>> Dear Group,
>>
>> Are there any restrictions in Redistribution tasks in the "real lab"
>> that we
>> must follow (beside the goal to obtain full reachability for all IGP
>> routes)? Say, if the task told that "mutual redistribute between EIGRP
>> and
>> OSPF in R1, RIP and EIGRP in R3" so we must follow that? If I see that
>> there
>> another point that should have redistribution between OSPF and EIGRP
>> (R2,
>> for example) but did not told so in the lab document, can I do that
>> redistribution? Can we do redistribution between BGP and IGP but not
>> told so
>> in the lab to have full reachability?
>>
>> Thanks and best Regards,
>> Khoa
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jul 18 2009 - 19:45:45 ART