Re: service-policy output on vlan interfaces

Hi,

Yes the 6500 and 7600 are essentially switches unless additional routing
blades are inserted.
 From a QOS perspective, this means they can mark and classify traffic,
but they cannot shape traffic.
For this you would need a Cisco 7600 Series SPA interface processor
(SIP), such as the 400 (yes it will work in a 6500 chassis), and
appropriate shared port adapter (SPA) such as the 2 port Gigabit
Ethernet SPA version 2 (it has two dual-purpose ports). There are
different types of SIP and SPA modules, and some will only function in
the 7600 chassis.

The SIP has its own router engine onboard and is able to do all those
funky things routers do.

regards Andy

Rebellion Wonder wrote:
> Steve,
>
> I am trying to apply this to WS-6548-GE-TX ports. Does 7600 has the same
> restriction as 6500?
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Steve Rossen <steve.rossen_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>> Your going to need to read up on PFC QoS for most modules for the
>> 6500. Several of the WAN modules (SPA) will work with your config but
>> my guess is your wanting to apply this to a standard 48-port copper
>> blade.
>>
>>
>> http://cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/qos.html
>>
>> Steve
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Rebellion Wonder<rebellionw_at_gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> I am trying to apply hierarchical policy maps on vlan interfaces either
>>>
>> on a
>>
>>> 6500 and a 7600.
>>>
>>> I am having several issues on applying them. If I try to use a
>>>
>> hierarchical
>>
>>> policy map, the vlan interface won't accept it.
>>>
>>> If I get rid of the nested policy-maps and use regular, simple, unnested
>>> policy maps, the service-policy input is accepted. However, for the
>>> service-policy output it says that bandwidth percent... or even bandwidth
>>> with no percent is not accepted by this interface.
>>>
>>> I have also tried to apply this on the layer 2 physical interface with
>>>
>> the
>>
>>> same results.
>>>
>>> Could this by the IOS version? Or is it simply no supported? If it is not
>>> supported, is there any workaround to achieve the same results.
>>>
>>> I am also having the same issue when trying to use shape average.
>>>
>>> These are the nested policy-maps I am trying to use:
>>>
>>> policy-map MARKING
>>> class VOICEIN
>>> police cir 784000 conform-action set-mpls-exp-imposition-transmit 5
>>> exceed-action drop
>>> class VIDEOIN
>>> set mpls experimental imposition 4
>>> class SIGNALINGIN
>>> set mpls experimental imposition 3
>>> class OAMIN
>>> set mpls experimental imposition 2
>>> class CRITICALDATAIN
>>> set mpls experimental imposition 1
>>> class DATAIN
>>> set mpls experimental imposition 0
>>>
>>> policy-map INPUTMPLS
>>> class class-default
>>> police cir 5000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>>> service-policy MARKING
>>>
>>> Policy-Map CLIENTLLQ
>>> class VOICEOUT
>>> police cir 784000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
>>> class VIDEOOUT
>>> bandwidth percent 5
>>> class SIGNALINGOUT
>>> bandwidth percent 25
>>> class OAMOUT
>>> bandwidth percent 15
>>> random-detect
>>> class CRITICALDATAOUT
>>> bandwidth percent 25
>>> random-detect
>>> class DATAOUT
>>> bandwidth percent 10
>>> random-detect
>>>
>>> Policy-Map CLIENTOUT
>>> Class class-default
>>> shape average 5000000
>>> service-policy CLIENTLLQ
>>>
>>> Many thanks,
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 11:25:05 ART