Re: service-policy output on vlan interfaces

Thank you for your answers. Do you think using WRR would be a good
alternative for LLQ and CBWFQ?

Thank you,

On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Andy Reid <ccie_at_reid.it> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> Yes the 6500 and 7600 are essentially switches unless additional routing
> blades are inserted.
> From a QOS perspective, this means they can mark and classify traffic, but
> they cannot shape traffic.
> For this you would need a Cisco 7600 Series SPA interface processor (SIP),
> such as the 400 (yes it will work in a 6500 chassis), and appropriate shared
> port adapter (SPA) such as the 2 port Gigabit Ethernet SPA version 2 (it has
> two dual-purpose ports). There are different types of SIP and SPA modules,
> and some will only function in the 7600 chassis.
>
> The SIP has its own router engine onboard and is able to do all those funky
> things routers do.
>
> regards Andy
>
>
> Rebellion Wonder wrote:
>
> Steve,
>
> I am trying to apply this to WS-6548-GE-TX ports. Does 7600 has the same
> restriction as 6500?
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 6:07 PM, Steve Rossen <steve.rossen_at_gmail.com> <steve.rossen_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>
>
> Your going to need to read up on PFC QoS for most modules for the
> 6500. Several of the WAN modules (SPA) will work with your config but
> my guess is your wanting to apply this to a standard 48-port copper
> blade.
>
> http://cisco.com/en/US/customer/docs/switches/lan/catalyst6500/ios/12.2SXF/native/configuration/guide/qos.html
>
> Steve
>
> On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 4:51 PM, Rebellion Wonder<rebellionw_at_gmail.com> <rebellionw_at_gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to apply hierarchical policy maps on vlan interfaces either
>
>
> on a
>
>
> 6500 and a 7600.
>
> I am having several issues on applying them. If I try to use a
>
>
> hierarchical
>
>
> policy map, the vlan interface won't accept it.
>
> If I get rid of the nested policy-maps and use regular, simple, unnested
> policy maps, the service-policy input is accepted. However, for the
> service-policy output it says that bandwidth percent... or even bandwidth
> with no percent is not accepted by this interface.
>
> I have also tried to apply this on the layer 2 physical interface with
>
>
> the
>
>
> same results.
>
> Could this by the IOS version? Or is it simply no supported? If it is not
> supported, is there any workaround to achieve the same results.
>
> I am also having the same issue when trying to use shape average.
>
> These are the nested policy-maps I am trying to use:
>
> policy-map MARKING
> class VOICEIN
> police cir 784000 conform-action set-mpls-exp-imposition-transmit 5
> exceed-action drop
> class VIDEOIN
> set mpls experimental imposition 4
> class SIGNALINGIN
> set mpls experimental imposition 3
> class OAMIN
> set mpls experimental imposition 2
> class CRITICALDATAIN
> set mpls experimental imposition 1
> class DATAIN
> set mpls experimental imposition 0
>
> policy-map INPUTMPLS
> class class-default
> police cir 5000000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
> service-policy MARKING
>
> Policy-Map CLIENTLLQ
> class VOICEOUT
> police cir 784000 conform-action transmit exceed-action drop
> class VIDEOOUT
> bandwidth percent 5
> class SIGNALINGOUT
> bandwidth percent 25
> class OAMOUT
> bandwidth percent 15
> random-detect
> class CRITICALDATAOUT
> bandwidth percent 25
> random-detect
> class DATAOUT
> bandwidth percent 10
> random-detect
>
> Policy-Map CLIENTOUT
> Class class-default
> shape average 5000000
> service-policy CLIENTLLQ
>
> Many thanks,
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at: http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jul 16 2009 - 09:24:28 ART