Thanks Andrew.
The old gear is fine for bastardised labs. I use a 4000 with bridge groups 
and fallback on remote racks for switching practice.
It's remote racks mostly for me. It adds up and contractor rates are 
falling!
Cheers
Gary
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "andrew" <andrew.coates_at_internode.on.net>
To: "'Gary Duncanson'" <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com>; "'Narbik 
Kocharians'" <narbikk_at_gmail.com>
Cc: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:47 PM
Subject: RE: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
> Well maybe at the very least you should look at something like dynamips 
> with
> real switches, its what I do, 3550's are cheap as chips. A lot of places 
> are
> starting to replace them with 2560/3750's etc and apart from layer 2 QOS
> there isn't a hell of a lot of difference ( the biggest one would be 
> private
> vlans).
>
> You could probably get away with a lab just using 3550's (also given that 
> it
> sounds like you have spent a lot of time on remote racks anyway), I have 
> two
> kids, I know what its like to be constantly interrupted, having my own lab
> Is a god send, I even get more then a few hours before I have to stop and 
> do
> family stuff.
>
> Infact I study with one strapped to my chest ( 6month old), but now she is
> old enough that she wants to do what I do and bash the keyboard........
>
>
> cheers
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of 
> Gary
> Duncanson
> Sent: Thursday, July 16, 2009 6:28 AM
> To: Narbik Kocharians
> Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
> Subject: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
>
> It helps if rackhire is affordable to be honest. A busy day at work, kids 
> at
> home. That rack session you had to schedule in advance has to get blown 
> off.
> A
> write off in terms of outlay.
>
> Gone are the days when C&W gave chaps time on works time to do labs I'm
> afraid. Evenings and weekends for most of us and that doesn't always go to
> plan!
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Narbik Kocharians
>  To: Gary Duncanson
>  Cc: Persio Pucci ; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
>  Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 9:13 PM
>  Subject: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
>
>
>  No R&S rack should cost more than $450 per month.
>
>
>  On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 12:44 PM, Gary Duncanson
> <gary.duncanson_at_googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>    Some of us regular guys always pay list price for rack rental and
> workbooks regardless of the options available. It adds up to thousands of
> dollars. But I guess some of us are old fashioned like that :)
>
>    Lots of chatter about all this sort of thing on the list of late. I
> don't
> pretend to understand what it's all about but I hope it all gets
> straightened
> out. I tanked on anymore labprep tonight. Really busy day at work today.
>    ----- Original Message ----- From: "Persio Pucci" <persio_at_gmail.com>
>    To: "Cisco certification" <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>    Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 7:49 PM
>
>    Subject: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
>
>
>
>      You know what? You have a good point there... I also think that the
> "pirate"
>      would not buy it anyway... but would a regular guy buy it if he had
> access
>      to the "pirated" material? What if it costed $1000? And how about
> $100?
> Or
>      even $10 as Darby mentioned... Maybe the problem is the price point?
> idk...
>
>      As for choosing INE, it was down to cost (yes, our pocket does have a
> bottom
>      too!!!)... and besides I tried to find out about IPexpert material
> (which
>      had almost the same price) but did not hear back from them, so I 
> chose
> INE.
>      Their approach is not my personal favorite, but they were responsive
> on
> my
>      inquiry... (guess everybody else was out on Networkers Live?)
>
>      On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 3:23 PM, Luan Nguyen <luan_at_netcraftsmen.net>
> wrote:
>
>
>        IMHO, choosing INE for SP only when you have a good understanding 
> of
> the
>        blueprint.  For starter, IEMentor, CCbootcamp, and IPExpert are
> probably
>        much better.  I like the proctor guide from IPExpert for
> security...explain
>        stuff to you.  But that's just me, other people from my company 
> like
>        INE...now that Scott is there, we probably could get good discount?
> :)
>        You guys have almost 10K every year...you can do more for the
> training
>        community:) take a bootcamp, buy something more expensive :) tell
> your
>        coworkers...since you seem to be under a nice boss.
>        Piracy is not that bad...for guys like you, you don't need to 
> pirate
>        anything.  For people who pirate stuff, they wouldn't buy them
> anyhow
> so
>        trainers don't lose much there.
>
>        Luan Nguyen
>        Chesapeake NetCraftsmen, LLC.
>        http://www3.netcraftsmen.net
>
>
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On 
> Behalf
> Of
>        Persio Pucci
>        Sent: Wednesday, July 15, 2009 1:27 PM
>        To: Cisco certification
>        Subject: Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
>
>         Brian,
>
>        please keep INE alive, I just recently bought the SP material and
> I'd
> love
>        to see that updated a little... :)
>
>        While saying that, I think the training vendors should ALSO invest
> (more)
>        on
>        the other tracks... if you are just a newcomer you might think it's
> R&S or
>        nothing. I know Cisco's next blow is the Voice 360... but hey, 
> there
> are
>        other tracks too... why not give them a little (more) attention?
>         *(And just for the record, I (well, the company) bought the R&S
> material
>        as
>        well in the past... 5 printed and 3 eletronics sets if I am not
> mistaken.
>        I'm doing my part helping you guys :D)*
>        I agree with Darby, however, that piracy is the damnation of any
> training
>        material (not Cisco-exclusive). Cannot think of a way out of it,
> however...
>        :(
>
>        On Tue, Jul 14, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Brian Dennis <
>        bdennis_at_internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
>        > As an FYI I'm not dead as rumored in the previous email ;-)
>        >
>        > I'll post an update to our blog tonight or tomorrow letting 
> people
> know
>        > what's going on at INE since a few people seem to be making up
> some
>> crazy
>        > off the wall rumors.  Basically we're just starting the process 
> of
>        opening
>        > up additional operations in the Seattle, WA area where I now
> currently
>        > live.  Although Reno, NV is a nice place the amount of high tech 
>  >
> workers
>        > is very limited to say the least.  This wasn't a problem when we
> were
>        > smaller but now we can't continue to grow with the limited high
> tech
>        > workforce in the Reno area.
>        >
>        > In order to continue to grow we need to have offices in an area
> that
>> has
>        a
>        > good technical workforce to select from.  Just trying to find a
> good
>        > full-time PHP web developer or CCNA in Reno is a real struggle.
> This > of
>        > course isn't the case in the Seattle area.  Additionally flights
> to
> the
>        > Seattle area for students attending classes are far better than
> the
>        > limited selection of flights to the Reno area.  Also the 
> selection
> of
>        > hotels for students is far better here in Seattle over Reno.
>        >
>        > Brian Dennis, CCIEx5 #2210 (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/SP/Voice)
>        > bdennis_at_internetworkexpert.com
>        >
>        > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>         > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/><
>        http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>        > Toll Free: 877-224-8987 x 703
>        > Outside US: 775-826-4344 x 703
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > ----- Original Message -----
>        > From: "Anthony Faria" <tfaria72_at_gmail.com>
>        > Sent: Sun, July 12, 2009 21:01
>        > Subject:Re: The State of the CCIE Training Industry
>        >
>        >
>        >  Were the blog hits low this week Darby ? LOL Really bro if you
> spent > as
>        > much
>        > time writing as you did studying you would be done with multiple
> ccie. > I
>        > think you are a skilled wirter I think you should apply at a e IT
>        magazine
>        > or something. Not trying to slam you bro but sometimes you are
> over
> the
>        > top.
>        > Things change and so do companies it is a fact of life. The stuff
> you
>        > originally bought was probably two lab versions ago. So if 5 
> years
>>
> later
>        > the
>        > company goes under well shit you got your money worth. So please
> keep
>        your
>        > posts to your blog on this stuff . If you are going to help and
> answer
>        > questions step up do some good instead of being war time media >
> coverage.
>        I
>        > seen Waynes alien Baby damn he is ugly!!! He sounded like Scott
> from
>> the
>        > audio series though LOL JK Scott.
>        >
>        > Tony
>        >
>        > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 11:05 AM, Darby Weaver
> <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com
>        > >wrote:
>        >
>        > > Hey don't take it quite so personal.  Well I'd better take a
> step
>> > back
>        on
>        > > that one as you are currently working for one of the companies
> that
>        other
>        > > companies are talking about lately.
>        > >
>        > > What I saw at the conference was a certain sense of fear of 
> what
> is
>        > > happening and there is a lot of fallout from that fear and > >
> uncertainty.
>        > >
>        > > Some said InternetworkExpert is going through some rough times
> and
>> > the
>        > only
>        > > two viable major companies left were:  The Cisco CCIE 360
> Consortium
>        and
>        > > IPExpert.
>        > >
>        > > Narbik joined the 360 it seems.
>        > >
>        > > InternetworkExpert may be perceived as having loss a certain
> sense
> of
>        > > direction - I'm just summarizing here - The question that was
> used
>> > for
>        a
>        > > basis is "What's happening with Brian Dennis and the CCIE 2.0
>        Program?".
>        > >
>        > > Don't take it that badly - I just gave you insight into what
> your
>        > > competition is thinking and you should consider my words
> carefully.
>        > >
>        > > It was that line of reasoning that got me worried a bit last
> night.
>        > >
>        > > Technically IE has the killer product - The PolyLabs and they
> are
>> > quite
>        > > innovative, creative, and quite possibly the single most act of
>>
>> genius
>        > > created in a while.  Simple plan and very nice exectution.
>        > >
>        > > IPExpert is expanding its borders.
>        > >
>        > > Cisco CCIE 360 is doing the same (kinda reminds me of pirates 
> on
> the
>        high
>        > > seas but hey it I'd hope someone is making money from it - ).
> Hah!
>        Hey
>        > > they had to get the instructors from somewhere.
>        > >
>        > > I'm kinda wondering when Scott Morris is going to go 
> independent
>        > actually.
>        > > You of all people have the name, reputation, sincerity, and
> technical
>        > > expertise to pull it off.   And you get back to people and
> everyone
>        know
>        > > it.
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > > I recall one instuctor saying he earned in 5 weeks at one point
> what
>        took
>        > > him almost a whole year to earn working for an employer.  And 
> of
>>
>> course
>        > he
>        > > is a very passionate instructor too.
>        > >
>        > > I kind of see one side trying to pick up all the chips or cash
> in
> the
>        > chips
>        > > that don't play the game.
>        > >
>        > >
>        > > The piracy thing is the single biggest attack on the CCIE
> program
> and
>        it
>        > is
>        > > a hard one to beat.  Companies want to sell en masse and as 
> long
> as
>        that
>        > is
>        > > working - great. However, we have a very limited market and 
> only
> so
>        many
>        > > candiates at a given time.
>        > >
>        > > I'm trying to say the Troubleshooting Section if delivered in
> classes
>        and
>        > > in
>        > > classes alone, then it may help turn this thing around.  But it
> won't
>        > work
>        > > if all companies and individuals don't come together to nip it
> in
> the
>        > bud.
>        > >
>        > >
>        > > Hey just an opinion.
>        > >
>        > > If trainers are selling 10,000 copies electroinically instead 
> of
> say > > 10
>        > or
>        > > even 100, then by all means carry on.
>        > >
>        > > If you ain't selling enough copies to justify the production
> costs
>> > (as
>        > has
>        > > been said to me privately), then you might want to take my
> observance
>        > into
>        > > account.
>        > >
>        > > Of course copy machines abound - but the real output ought to 
> be
> in > > the
>        > > class room itself and presentation.
>        > >
>        > > Scott you are quite legendary at this and you of all people
> would
> be > > a
>        > > person to profit from such a situation.
>        > >
>        > > Time are changing.  Sorry to kick things back to the stone 
> ages,
> but
>        > > security is not quite so secure on intellectual property these
> days.
>        > >  Handle
>        > > with care.
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > >
>        > > On Sat, Jul 11, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com>
>>
>> wrote:
>        > >
>        > > > So your shock and awe about two companies left in the end was
> meant
>        to
>        > > > educate everyone that people stealing the digital downloads 
> is
> bad?
>        > >  that's
>        > > > a very strange way of delivering that message.
>        > > >
>        > > > And no, I haven't read your wiki.  Didn't know you had one
> because > > > I
>        > > > haven't really had the need to Google you and find out what
> things
>        were
>        > > or
>        > > > were not posted by/about you.
>        > > >
>        > > > Next thing you know you're going to go with all-out > > >
> exclusive-photos
>        of
>        > > > Wayne Lawson's Alien Baby.  And I just really don't think
> that's
>        > > necessary.
>        > > > That's a private family matter.
>        > > >
>        > > > ;)
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > *Scott Morris*, CCIE*x4*
> (R&amp;S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service
>        > Provider)
>        >  #4713,
>        > > >
>        > > > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>        > > >
>        > > > JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>        > > >
>        > > > evil_at_ine.com
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>        > > >
>        > > >
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com<http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>        <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/><
>        > http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>        > > >
>        > > > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>        > > >
>        > > > Outside US: 775-826-4344
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > Knowledge is power.
>        > > >
>        > > > Power corrupts.
>        > > >
>        > > > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > Darby Weaver wrote:
>        > > >
>        > > > FYI -
>        > > >
>        > > > I'm not so much concerned with Brian Dennis and whether or 
> not
> he's
>        > still
>        > > > with IE, I would hope he is, but if he's not I do not see 
> such
> a
>        > talented
>        > > > individual being without options.
>        > > >
>        > > > I'm not so much as concerned about my nose and whether or not
> it
> is
>        > > broken
>        > > > or not.  (I guess someone never read my Wiki).
>        > > >
>        > > > I am concerned about my general investment in the CCIE
> Program.
>> > > That
>        > is
>        > > the
>        > > > point of the matter.
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > I am concerned when I see CCIE Instructors and Content
> Developers
>        > > speaking
>        > > > of no longer being able to make a living at their 
> expectations
> in
>        this
>        > > > industry.  This concerns me and if you have invested money in
> some > > > of
>        > > these
>        > > > programs and have a vested interest then it may or may not
> concern
>        you.
>        > > >
>        > > > The tabloid thing catches the eye - but the real matter is
> that
>> > > with
>        > the
>        > > > advent of technology - people are taking advantage of the 
> ease
> of
>        > > downloads
>        > > > and literally bankrupting an otherwise thriving industry.
>        > > >
>        > > >
>        > > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>        > > >
>        > > >
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> __
>        > > > Subscription information may be found at:
>        > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>        > >
>        > >
>        > > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>        > >
>        > >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>        > > Subscription information may be found at:
>        > > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>        >
>        >
>        > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>        >
>        >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>        > Subscription information may be found at:
>        > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > ----- End of original message -----
>        >
>        >
>        >
>        > ----- End of original message -----
>        >
>        >
>        > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>        >
>        >
> _______________________________________________________________________
>        > Subscription information may be found at:
>        > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>        Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _____________________________________________________________________
> __
>        Subscription information may be found at:
>        http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>      Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
>      Subscription information may be found at:
>      http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>    Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
>    _______________________________________________________________________
>    Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  Narbik Kocharians
>  CCSI#30832, CCIE# 12410 (R&S, SP, Security)
>  www.MicronicsTraining.com
>  Sr. Technical Instructor
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jul 15 2009 - 21:53:58 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART