Wayne! Good morning!
Can not agree more... I was just trying to put an final end with the
line:
"Investment protection protects the product and not the program"...
The term CCIE E2E confuses itself with a product, and it4s not, it4s a
"bundle" of products, that are covered individually in the protection
program, and that was the big cause of confusion for most of us.... Well,
can4t say about the others, but at least it was for me!
And of course, no vendor (either IP Expert, INE, Narbik, or anyone else)
would have to cover for any exam change that Cisco may or may not apply in a
near future, as Scott well said, if they insert new topics like how to split
an atom, that will demand new materials (VoD4s, Audio, Workbooks), in other
words, vendors will need to develop the material, spending time (and money)
and it4s completely fair to charge for the upgrades.
The big point was... we were all confusing CCIE E2E with a product... and
in fact, it4s not, it4s a program (in other words a bundle of products)...
Also agree that this was long discussed... nothing more to say! ;)
Have a great day!
Cheers!
-- Caue Wailemann MSN: cauew6_at_hotmail.com Skype ID: cauefw --- Visit my Blog: http://cauew.blogspot.com --- Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Tue Jul 14 2009 - 10:41:21 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART