Re: OEQ - Scope ??

Thanks Shaun & Darby .. Helpful Information Indeed ..

Regards,
Ravi

On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 3:50 AM, Darby Weaver <ccie.weaver_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Ravi,
>
> Let me help you a bit. In the CCIE TECCCIE-3004 Techtorial, given by Steve
> Barnes, about 30-40 OEQ's were shared with the attendees rather quickly and
> only a couple of the entire bunch seemed to stump the whole group. I think
> I changed my mind on like one of them and missed one or two others at first
> glance. After a while he was moving pretty quickly and I was taking notes
> of the OEQ's.
>
> Let's see - if I could sum them all up in a few words:
>
> They seem to be derivatives of items that might be found in the CCIE
> Written Book by Cisco Press overall.
>
> They are mostly fair questions. Not that you'll find most of them in any
> test bank anywhere.
>
> They are probably more "experience" and "observation" of any given protocol
> more than anything else - by this I mean if you have been configuring
> protocols while preparing for the CCIE Lab then you probably stumbled on
> OEQ's the entire time if you ever asked yourself questions like "Why does it
> work this way", "When does this happen", what are some attributes of this or
> that feature or command, etc.
>
> The essence of the OEQ is simple: Discrimination.
>
> The OEQ's were called a "Discriminator".
>
> The idea is to discriminate against those people who score say 100% on
> Frame Relay over OSPF and use the Priority 0 command and can configure it
> perfectly and yet when asked a question about this scenario have not the
> first idea on why a person might even use the priority command - for
> example.
>
>
> So a well-qualified candiate would do well and gain an easy 21 points. A
> paper tiger will lose those same 21 points and thus fail the lab.
>
>
>
>
>
> On Thu, Jul 9, 2009 at 8:52 PM, Ravi Singh <way2ccie_at_googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> Thanks Scott and Anthony for increasing my worry levels ;-) .. Just
>> Kidding.. Thank you guys ..I was misinterpreting Core Knowledge as Core
>> Technology Topics on the exam...
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ravi
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 10, 2009 at 1:24 AM, Scott Morris <smorris_at_ine.com> wrote:
>>
>> > According to the CCIE team, the scope is "any topic on the lab
>> > blueprint". That certainly leaves a lot to the imagination. Especially
>> > given how vague the blueprint can be!
>> >
>> > I can tell you they will NOT ask about token ring or ATM. :) Beyond
>> that,
>> > follow the blueprint!
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > *Scott Morris*, CCIE*x4* (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider)
>> #4713,
>>
>> >
>> > JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>> >
>> > JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>> >
>> > evil_at_ine.com
>> >
>> >
>> > Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>> >
>> > http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>> >
>> > Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>> >
>> > Outside US: 775-826-4344
>> >
>> >
>> > Knowledge is power.
>> >
>> > Power corrupts.
>> >
>> > Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Ravi Singh wrote:
>> >
>> > Hello everyone,
>> >
>> > I am not sure if this has been discussed before, apologies if it has
>> been,
>> > but what all, as per you, can be classifed as "Core Knowledge" for the
>> > OEQs. Is it just the routing protocols, WAN and switching or is it the
>> > entire blueprint ..Considering the scope of the OEQs , what all areas
>> should
>> > be stressed upon and what can be ignored(only from the perspective of
>> the
>> > OEQs) ..
>> >
>> > Thanks for all the incoming inputs
>> >
>> > Ravi
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Jul 10 2009 - 11:02:40 ART