Re: OT-Cisco Video Surveillance Solution

From: ALL From_NJ <all.from.nj_at_gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 7 Jul 2009 23:19:28 -0400

You need both as they have different jobs and are both needed, but you can
both run on the same server so this should help. The hardware requirements
are pretty low ... but you do need access to a fair amount of storage
space.

Curiosity got the best of me and I wanted to learn more (I am easily
distracted) ... and I found this link very helpful. Will definitely answer
your questions.

http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/security/physical_security/video_surveillance/network/design/vsmrg_v2.pdf

Interestingly enough, if the viewers are in the same location, might be best
to run mcast for the viewers ... especially if over the WAN. The link above
describes how and why. Cool stuff.

HTH,

Andrew Lee Lissitz

On Tue, Jul 7, 2009 at 2:00 AM, jockey wearer <jockeywearer_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Dear All,
>
> I am preparing BOQ for Cisco Video surveillance .
> We need 30 Cameras with recording of One week with 3 Viewers and and One
> admin .
> I am little bit in confusion with Cisco Video Surveillance Media
> Server software and Cisco Video Surveillance Operations Manager
> Software .what is real difference between them .
> It is necessary to use both on one server .
> As I want cost-effective solution and only minimul requirement of software
> .
>
> Anybody has experience with this .
>
> Regards
> Prashant
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Andrew Lee Lissitz
all.from.nj_at_gmail.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Jul 07 2009 - 23:19:28 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Sat Aug 01 2009 - 13:10:22 ART