Re: VPNv4 next-hop-self

From: NN Kumar <nagendra.cisco_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2009 17:32:25 +0530

Hi,

One good reason, I can remember is Inter-AS VPN option B-2a.

CE1-----PE1---------ASBR1------------ASBR2------------PE2-------------CE2
             |-------As100----| |-------As200------|

With Option B, you will advertise VPNv4 prefixes to eBGP neighbor which will
be the ASBR of neighboring AS. As next-hop attribute will not be changed
when the update is sent to iBGP, you either:

1. have to set "next-hop-self" in ASBR (Option B-2a) or
2. You can redistribute the host route (/32 route entry) for directly
connected ASBR which will be created automatically and installed in your
routing table. (Option B-2b)

Regards,
Nagendra

On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 4:40 PM, Splinter <splinter330_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi All,
>
> please can anyone help me understand when to use the next-hop-self under
> the
> vpnv4 process and why this is needed.
> any good examples are welcome to get a better understanding.
>
> thank you
>
> Splinter
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Jun 29 2009 - 17:32:25 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:38 ART