Re: Frame-relay Fragmentation

From: Jared Scrivener <jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jun 2009 14:31:02 +1000

Don't forget MLPPPoFR with PPP fragmentation. That's another option.

On 6/20/09 1:31 PM, "Dennis Worth" <dennis.worth_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hey Group,
> I just want to get this straight before moving on.
>
> Cisco defines 3 frame-relay fragmentation methods - FRF.12, FRF.11 Annex C,
> and Cisco Proprietary using 'vofr cisco'
>
> If defined under the interface using frame-relay fragment end-to-end, no
> traffic shaping is required based off testing. If applied under a class map
> however, traffic-shaping is required in order to apply it to a PVC or
> multiple PVC's
>
> Is there anything that I am missing or should add this?
>
> Thanks,

Cheers,

Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat Jun 20 2009 - 14:31:02 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:37 ART