How will you become a ccie if you don't pass the exam? That is the first priority of becoming a ccie, to pass the lab. I don't know what you meant by your first sentence.
You should provide an example of how else a training company should measure success if not by passing rates or statistics. Maybe by who has the nicest looking instructors? Oh wait, that already has been discussed here. Personally, I'd want to use the material that was used by the most number of people who passed the lab. If the numbers are close, then it's a toss up to other variables, such as personality and good looks...haha.
I know not everyone is motivated by money but job security is on the top of my list and my number helps a lot with that. The nice salary just happens to come with the number.
-----Original Message-----
From: Nasser Abraham <nasser.abraham_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2009 13:44:34
To: Wayne Lawson<groupstudy_at_ipexpert.com>
Cc: Narbik Kocharians<narbikk_at_gmail.com>; Brad Ellis<brad_at_ccbootcamp.com>; Joe Astorino<jastorino_at_ipexpert.com>; Guagliata, Justin<JGuagliata_at_leegov.com>; ccielab_at_groupstudy.com<ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
Subject: Re: CCIE bootcamp that will take learning credits?
Wayne,
Not everyone who pursues a CCIE does so just to pass an exam. You really
cannot measure the quality of training material purely based upon how many
people have passed the CCIE exam. Also, not everyone is motivated by a
"six-figure income", but if that is the way you try to sell your product,
then kudos to you.
In saying that, we have the 360 program available to us through work. Whilst
I find the 360 program to be a valuable resource, I would consider INE CCIE
2.0 program to be more comprehensive in teaching the technologies.
On Wed, Jun 10, 2009 at 8:30 AM, Wayne Lawson <groupstudy_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
> I guess the questions to ask are: *how many people have passed using 360
> material* and *how many people have passed using "grey market" material*....
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Jun 10 2009 - 11:43:19 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:37 ART