Re: Ipexpert section 5 v9 WB doubts.

Bryan has this nailed. The wording here is a little confusing due to the
word threshold matching the command keyword. Functionally you've configured
it correctly, Andy.

I'll change the wording in the updates I'm working on for the RS 4.0 from
"threshold" to "limit" so no one has to be confused by it again once they
hit the press. :)

On 6/4/09 4:42 PM, "Bryan Bartik" <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:

> Andy,
>
> I don't have v9 readily available, we are on v10 now :-) but...
>
> I see what you mean about 5.15. Especially since the percentage value is
> known as "threshold" in the command reference :-) In this case, 60 is the
> value and the percentage at which the warning is generated does not matter.
>
> In a case where you have 2 ABR's, you might want to clarify that with the
> proctor, if you are feeling lucky. I think you have it nailed ;-)
>
> Bryan Bartik
> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
> On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 1:21 PM, Andy Hogard <andyhogard_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> *Task 5.15,*
>>
>> Assume that Area 78 will be redistributing Rip. Make sure that no more than
>> 60 routes are learned via Rip before redistribution is stopped at that
>> threshold.
>>
>> The solution I configured on R7 and R8, is
>>
>> *conf t
>> router ospf 1
>> redistribute maximum-prefix 60 100
>> end*
>>
>> Here the threshold is set to 100, whereas in the PG the solution is given
>> to
>> be *"redistribute maximum-prefix 60" *
>>
>> So when I re read the question ..and concentrate on the keywords in the
>> latter part of the question, *"redistribution is stopped at that threshold"
>> * which implies that no matter what, the router must not re-distribute more
>> than 60 external routes ..I mean they are reffering to* "60 routes as the
>> threshold"* and are *really not bothered about what threshold value the
>> warning is genereated at. *
>>
>> Just the use of *"threshold" word in the question is making things twisted
>> for me. *Am I correct with the explaination or with my solution?!
>>
>>
>> One more,
>>
>> *Task 5.13*
>>
>> Summarise the networks advertised by R4, these networks are 172.4.0.4 -
>> 172.4.3.4/24
>>
>> Now, since Router4 is a part of area 246 only ..and since area 246 has two
>> ABRs Router2 and Router6. They both must be configured with *"area 246
>> range
>> 172.4.0.0 255.255.252.0".*
>>
>> I know I am correct on this one for sure(don't burst my bubble) but the
>> solution in the PG configures the summary on R2 only. Can you explain, why
>> ?!
>>
>>
>> There, is one from frame relay task as well ..but there I have figured
>> where
>> I went wrong, and have made a note of it. All other tasks were smooth.
>>
>>
>> I am looking forward hearing from my gurus at IpExpert and others as well.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Andy H.
>>
>> --
>> My Blog URL: http://ccielog.blogspot.com/
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> --
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

Cheers,

Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP
Sr. Technical Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Jun 04 2009 - 17:08:27 ART