RE: Issues in CCIE lab initial configs

From: Grant Stevenson <Grant.Stevenson_at_btinet.bt.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Jun 2009 20:25:15 +0100

Hi,
 
My personal approach was to fix layer 2, then layer 3, and not worry about what they broke.
 
Just sweep it up as you go along.
 
Be careful how you ask your questions though, as it can come across as if you are fishing for information that could be considered NDA.
 
If you have done the practise labs, you will be fine, just remember, they are not there to fail you, thats up to you to achieve that.
 
Dont panic, there is plenty of time, just read the question, not what you think it should be, but what they want. READ carefully.
 
Good Luck
 
Grant

 
________________________________

m: nobody_at_groupstudy.com on behalf of Joe Astorino
Sent: Wed 03/06/2009 19:34
To: 'Jared Scrivener'; 'Wouter Prins'; 'Naufal Jamal'
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Issues in CCIE lab initial configs

I have to agree with Jared...but again it is just personal preference. For
me, I find that if I just skip things like that I tend to not pay enough
attention to details later, and end up missing easy points that I should
have caught. My attack plan (that worked first attempt) for troubleshooting
was to look at all the running-configs before starting the config
portion...go through and fix everything so that I had basic IP connectivity
-- In other words make sure every router can ping every other router it is
attached to without using routing ...routers on the same ethernet segment,
routers directly attached to serial interfaces, and of course your frame.
Only then did I start doing anything from the lab workbook. Just my 2
cents.

Regards,

Joe Astorino
CCIE #24347 (R&S)
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Jared Scrivener
Sent: Wednesday, June 03, 2009 2:25 PM
To: 'Wouter Prins'; 'Naufal Jamal'
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: RE: Issues in CCIE lab initial configs

I'd do exactly the opposite and fix the errors first before starting my
configuration. Just my opinion. Both approaches should work if you know what
you are doing well. :)

Cheers,

Jared Scrivener CCIE3 #16983 (R&S, Security, SP), CISSP Sr. Technical
Instructor - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com <http://www.ipexpert.com/>
Telephone: +1.810.326.1444
Fax: +1.810.454.0130
Mailto: jscrivener_at_ipexpert.com

-----Original Message-----
From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
Wouter Prins
Sent: Wednesday, 3 June 2009 2:17 PM
To: Naufal Jamal
Cc: ccielab_at_groupstudy.com
Subject: Re: Issues in CCIE lab initial configs

Hello,

I find it easier to just skip this part and fix the issues while doing the
lab itself. I've noticed im much faster in seeing something that doesnt work
when testing the connection/debugging then looking for something at the
beginning in possibly big initial configs.

Just my opinion ofcourse :P

2009/6/3 Naufal Jamal <naufalccie_at_yahoo.in>

> Hey Guys,
>
> Can anyone give some examples of initial config issues that we may
> face during the lab? like someone told me when he was configuring
> frame relay he wasnt getting the routes propagated across the
> peers.after scrutnising the initial config he saw a "no ip routing"
> command configured on one of the routers.
> would appreciate if some one could share these types of common issues
> in the initial config that could save some time of ours..
>
> :)
>
>
>
> Explore and discover exciting holidays and getaways with Yahoo!
> India Travel http://in.travel.yahoo.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net <http://www.ccie.net/>
>
> ______________________________________________________________________
> _ Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Wouter Prins
wp_at_null0.nl
0x301FA912
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net <http://www.ccie.net/> 
Received on Wed Jun 03 2009 - 20:25:15 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Wed Jul 01 2009 - 20:02:36 ART