Re: NEXT_HOP behavior in a confederation

Hey Syed ,

You can consider Confederation as .....

Confed ID : 200

     AS 200
       / \
     / \
 64512 64513

+)64512 and 64513 are Sub-AS of AS 200 .and considered to be as IBGP.

Rsharma

On 5/27/09, Joe Astorino <jastorino_at_ipexpert.com> wrote:
> That is correct, treat it just like iBGP in that respect
>
>
> ------Original Message------
> From: Syed Taukir
> Sender: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
> To: CCIE Groupstudy
> ReplyTo: Syed Taukir
> Subject: NEXT_HOP behavior in a confederation
> Sent: May 27, 2009 10:27 AM
>
> R0-------R1------R2--------R3---------R4----------R5
>
> R0 - AS 100
> R1 - AS 64512 (member of confed id 200)
> R2 - AS 64512 (member of confed id 200)
> R3 - AS 64513 ((member of confed id 200)
> R4- AS 64513 (member of confed id 200)
> R5- As 300
>
> There's no next hop self configured on any of the routers inside the
> confederation.
>
> The next hop for R3 to reach R1's loopback is not R2 BUT it is R1. So does
> this mean to say that the next hop behavior doesnt change throughout the
> confed
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Joe Astorino
> CCIE #24347 (R&S)
> Sr. Support Engineer IPexpert, Inc.
> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 27 2009 - 23:50:00 ART