Re: OSPF Virtual Link

Hi Ryan,
             Please see below the related info:

R1#sh ip os vir
Virtual Link OSPF_VL4 to router 2.2.2.2 is up
  Run as demand circuit
  DoNotAge LSA allowed.
  Transit area 5, via interface Serial0/1, Cost of using 64
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    Hello due in 00:00:06
    Adjacency State FULL (Hello suppressed)
    Index 2/3, retransmission queue length 0, number of retransmission 0
    First 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
    Last retransmission scan length is 0, maximum is 0
    Last retransmission scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
R1#
router ospf 1
 router-id 1.1.1.1
 ispf
 log-adjacency-changes
 area 5 virtual-link 2.2.2.2
 network 5.5.12.1 0.0.0.0 area 5
 neighbor 5.5.55.2
!
========================================================================================

R2#sh ip os vir
Virtual Link OSPF_VL0 to router 1.1.1.1 is up
  Run as demand circuit
  DoNotAge LSA allowed.
  Transit area 5, via interface Serial0/0, Cost of using 64
  Transmit Delay is 1 sec, State POINT_TO_POINT,
  Timer intervals configured, Hello 10, Dead 40, Wait 40, Retransmit 5
    Hello due in 00:00:04
    Adjacency State INIT
    Index 0/0, retransmission queue length 0, number of retransmission 0
    First 0x0(0)/0x0(0) Next 0x0(0)/0x0(0)
    Last retransmission scan length is 0, maximum is 0
    Last retransmission scan time is 0 msec, maximum is 0 msec
R2#
router ospf 1
 router-id 2.2.2.2
 log-adjacency-changes
 area 5 virtual-link 1.1.1.1
 network 5.5.55.2 0.0.0.0 area 5
!

thanks
Syed

On Tue, May 26, 2009 at 11:50 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> Syed,
>
> To better assist, please post 's ip os nei', 's run | s r o', and 's run
> int lo 0'
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Syed Ali
> Sent: Tuesday, May 26, 2009 4:44 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: OSPF Virtual Link
>
> Hi Experts,
> I have a virtual link between two routers. One side is adj
> is FULL but the other side shows INIT. Each side is configured with the
> remote side router id as the virtual link peer but no success. Can anyone
> help?
>
> thanks
> Syed
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed May 27 2009 - 00:05:50 ART