RE: forming RIPv2 adjacency in unicast?

This is one of the most weird things I've seen. You have to use NAT to translate the multicast address into a unicast address.

-----Mensaje original-----
De: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] En nombre de Salah ElShekeil
Enviado el: jueves, 21 de mayo de 2009 9:46
Para: qospf qospf
CC: Cisco certification
Asunto: Re: forming RIPv2 adjacency in unicast?

how u would do it without neighbor command?

by default RIPv2 to multicast group , the only command will change this
behavior to unicast is neighbor command :-) ,

On Thu, May 21, 2009 at 10:28 AM, qospf qospf <cisco.qospf_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> what are the ways of forming RIPv2 adjacency using unicast only (no
> bcast/multicast allowed) assuming that you can't use the neighbor
> command....any ideas?
>
> thx
>
> --
> --------
> check out my blog! http://qospf.wordpress.com
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Salah
CCIE# 24207
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net