Normally, you can use match criteria for valid values for the protocol you
are redistributing *FROM*, therefore AS_PATH is a valid option here.
Seems like they might have mentioned a bug then.
Just curious, are you using 12.4.23 or 12.4.23T?
On Fri, May 15, 2009 at 4:58 AM, Ronald Johns <rj686b_at_att.com> wrote:
> In the IPExpert Proctor Guide (Volume 1 Section 12 Task 12.25), it says
> that you cannot use an as-path list to match on when using it to
> redistribute BGP into RIP, but it seems to work for me. I'm just
> curious if this is a bug or a fix. I'm running Version 12.4(23) on
> 2811's...
>
> Here are portions of my config (R1 and R2 are RIP peers.):
>
> R2
>
> ip as-path access-list 1 permit ^$
>
> route-map offset-bgp permit 10
> match as-path 1
> set metric 4
> route-map offset-bgp permit 20
> set metric 9
>
> router rip
> version 2
> redistribute bgp 256 route-map offset-bgp
> network 150.100.0.0
> no auto-summary
>
> Here are two routes received from R2 on R1:
>
> R 200.0.1.9 [120/9] via 150.100.12.2, 00:00:26, FastEthernet0/0
> R 200.0.1.5 [120/4] via 150.100.12.2, 00:00:26, FastEthernet0/0
>
> Thanks in advance,
> Ron
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
-- Pavel Bykov ---------------- Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/ Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.netReceived on Fri May 15 2009 - 06:57:47 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:43 ART