Re: Design reasons for LACP active versus on

If you configure statically (on), the negotiation time can be saved. So I
would go for (on) rather than active or desirable.

Marc La Porte <marc.a.laporte_at_gmail.com>
Sent by: nobody_at_groupstudy.com
12/05/2009 02:46 PM
Please respond to
Marc La Porte <marc.a.laporte_at_gmail.com>

To
Cisco certification <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
cc

Subject
Design reasons for LACP active versus on

Hi,

From a design viewpoint, configuring LACP (L2 Etherchannel) from an access
switch (6500) to a third-party server (IBM, HP, etc) would it be better to
configure our side as "active" or as "on"?

Thanks
Marc

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue May 12 2009 - 14:48:06 ART