Re: %BGP-3-NOTIFICATION (unsupported/disjoint capability)

It's perspective and placement. With IPv4 unicast OR IPv4 unicast vrf
(whatever) you are still sending 32-bit routes. The placement (main
table vs. vrf table) is a local decision and has nothing to do with what
you are sending.

VPNv4 address family sends an entirely different looking route
advertisement (96 bit info) so it would not line up properly. Just like
you don't bring your 18-wheeler to the automated car wash at the gas
station. While both are vehicles, and both need to be washed, clearly
things don't line up right. :)

*Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,

JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.

JNCI-M, JNCI-ER

smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com

Internetwork Expert, Inc.

http://www.InternetworkExpert.com

Toll Free: 877-224-8987

Outside US: 775-826-4344

Knowledge is power.

Power corrupts.

Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......

Dheven wrote:
> Hi Bryan
>
> I have tested
>
> IPV4 to IPV4 = works
> IPV4 address-family vrf 123 to IPV4 = works
> VPNV4 to IPV4 = not working (unsupported/disjoint capability) error
>
> Thanx
>
> D
>
>
> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 8:03 PM, Dheven <dheven_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>> Hi Bryan,
>>
>> My router R1 VPNV4 router needs to form a BGP neighbor with my BB2 router
>> which is a IPV4 router.
>>
>> can this be done.
>>
>>
>> Here is my configs:
>>
>> R1:
>>
>> router bgp 100
>> no bgp default ipv4-unicast
>> no bgp default route-target filter
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 remote-as 254 (BB2 eth0 int)
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 update-source loopback 0
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 ebgp-mu
>>
>> address-family vpnv4
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 activate
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 send-community ext
>> neighbor 172.10.0.254 next-hop-unchanged
>>
>> BB2:
>>
>> router bgp 254
>> neighbor 10.10.1.1 remote-as 100 (R1 Loop0)
>> neighbor 10.10.1.1 ebgp-mu
>> network 192.168.1.0 mask 255.255.255.0
>>
>>
>> D
>>
>>
>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 7:47 PM, Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Dheven,
>>>
>>> What are you trying to accomplish? Your VPNv4 neighbor needs to peer with
>>> another VPNv4 router. Both sides should be activated under the VPNv4 address
>>> family.
>>>
>>> Bryan Bartik
>>> CCIE #23707 (R&S), CCNP
>>> Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
>>> URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
>>>
>>> On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 11:37 AM, Dheven <dheven_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>> Hi GS,
>>>>
>>>> I have created a BGP address family vpnv4 neighbor with an IPV4 router
>>>> and i
>>>> am getting the above message.
>>>>
>>>> any assistance how to bring up my neighbors will be greatly appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> I have tried from IPV4 to IPV4 and it works but the from VPNV4 to IPV4
>>>>
>>>> Regards
>>>>
>>>> D
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Always forgive your enemies - Nothing annoys them so much.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> --
>> Always forgive your enemies - Nothing annoys them so much.

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 17:21:57 ART