I remember trying it before, if I recall correctly, ODR supports wildcards
(classless?) if you configured it.
The reason that default route goes through ODR is for several (past)
implementation where a common ODR spoke router is the 'stub'. Thus, instead
of putting default route via static, ODR was one of the flavor to go for.
Besides, using ODR in cisco-only environment would speed up deployment and
let those boxes chat by themselves on which default route to hop on to.
Hope that helps :)
DC
On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:48 AM, Scott Morris <
smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
> Great question. I have no idea. :) If it accepts wildcards, then
> you have your answer! I would assume so, but I haven't tried it!
>
>
>
>
> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
>
> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
>
> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
>
> smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com
>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
>
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
>
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
>
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
>
> Knowledge is power.
>
> Power corrupts.
>
> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
>
>
>
> Ryan West wrote:
> > Thanks Scott. Is it still in a classful format only or can wildcards
> > be added?
> >
> > Sent from handheld.
> >
> > On May 11, 2009, at 10:39 AM, "Scott Morris"
> > <smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com
> > <mailto:smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I've both used one and and not used one, but never had any problem
> >> with functionality....
> >>
> >> You use the network statement to DIRECT which interfaces you are
> >> sending the 0/0 to. Otherwise with just "router odr" you'll blast
> >> that out to all your CDP interfaces/neighbors which may not be what
> >> you want.
> >>
> >> HTH,
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> *Scott Morris*, CCIE/x4/ (R&S/ISP-Dial/Security/Service Provider) #4713,
> >>
> >> JNCIE-M #153, JNCIS-ER, CISSP, et al.
> >>
> >> JNCI-M, JNCI-ER
> >>
> >> smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com <mailto:smorris_at_internetworkexpert.com>
> >>
> >>
> >> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> >>
> >> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com
> >>
> >> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> >>
> >> Outside US: 775-826-4344
> >>
> >>
> >> Knowledge is power.
> >>
> >> Power corrupts.
> >>
> >> Study hard and be Eeeeviiiil......
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Ryan West wrote:
> >>> Hello,
> >>>
> >>> I had my last short session on the ASET labs last night for some final
> >>> warm-ups. And I ran into an issue with ODR. It seems the correct
> answer was
> >>> to include a network statement on the hub router. The configuration
> guide
> >>> would leave you to believe that feature doesn't even exist. As far as
> syntax
> >>> and timers go, it's very RIP like, so I can understand the desire to
> want to
> >>> include a network statement. However, the spoke router was getting its
> >>> default route via o... Any idea why a network statement would be used?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> -ryan
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________________________________
> >>> Subscription information may be found at:
> >>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 11:52:31 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART