Re: any one looking for CCIE #

From: Dale Shaw <dale.shaw_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 11 May 2009 22:33:16 +1000

Hi,

On Mon, May 11, 2009 at 10:00 PM, Danshtr <danshtr_at_gmail.com> wrote:
> http://www.ccieflyer.com/2009-Mar-Monica-Cojocneanu.php

Sorry, I had to stop once I noticed that neither the interviewer or
the interviewee knew the difference between "loose" and "lose".

I can only hope it was a transcribed phone interview.

Back on topic, I view people with such fraudulent CCIE # associations
as dishonest and greedy. It doesn't reflect well on your character at
all. The rules are plain as day -- the partner requirements are there
so ensure partner organisations can deliver a specified level of
service. If that organisation has attained Silver or Gold status
through fraudulent CCIE # associations, how well do you think they'll
be doing in the marketplace? How successful will their projects be?

How will it look when the a legitimate recruiter or prospective
employer discovers you're associated with a shady partner
organisation? What message does it send?

My advice to you all is to carefully weigh up your options before
getting blinded by the dollar signs. Discussing it on a public forum
is pretty stupid, too, I might add.

cheers,
Dale

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon May 11 2009 - 22:33:16 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART