Hi Ryan,
why not going with:
spanning-tree vlan x forward-time 6
20 + 6 + 6 = 32
Mike
2009/5/9 Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com>
> Anbu,
>
> Thanks for the replay, I understand those phases on paper. What I'm trying
> to
> figure out when this actually happens and what type of wording in a
> question
> might key me to take into account. For example, the ASET lab asks this:
>
> Configure switch 1 as the STP root and set the following parameters:
>
> * Root priority of zero (0)
>
> * An access port start-up delay, due to Spanning Tree, of 32
> seconds.
>
> Which in this case means set the forward-time to 16 seconds and priority of
> associated VLANs to 0. What I'm trying to figure out is when I need to
> account for blocking as well.
>
> -ryan
>
> From: Anbu [mailto:ksanpu_at_gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, May 09, 2009 3:29 PM
> To: Ryan West
> Cc: Cisco certification
> Subject: Re: STP access port start-up delay or intialization to forwarding
> delay
>
> From blocking to listening - 20 Sec
> Listening to Learning - 15 sec
> Learning to Forwarding - 15 sec
>
> So total 50 sec.
> On Sat, May 9, 2009 at 7:33 PM, Ryan West
> <rwest_at_zyedge.com<mailto:rwest_at_zyedge.com>> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was going through some of the ASET exams and I was wondering if someone
> might have some insight on key word detection for an STP question. What
> wording would key you into accounting for blocking time when taking a port
> from <state described in question> to forwarding?
>
> Thanks,
>
> -ryan
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 09 2009 - 22:09:16 ART
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART