Re: IEWB - Lab5 Task6.2

Can the experts please help to explain this? i'm interested to know the
reason why ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local was included in the SG as well.
Thank you.

On Fri, Aug 22, 2008 at 4:20 PM, Nitro Drops <nitrodrops_at_hotmail.com> wrote:

> Task6.2
> R1
>
> Interface Serial1/0ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1::1/64
> ipv6 address FE80::1 link-local
> frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1::3 113 broadcast
>
> R3
> Interface Serial1/1
> ipv6 address 2001:CC1E:1::3/64
>
> frame-relay map ipv6 2001:CC1E:1::1 311 broadcast
> frame-relay map ipv6 FE80::1 311
>
> Q1.) Why is there a need to configure link-local on R1 s1/0 and not
> on R3 s1/1? At this stage, no IGP routings are required, why is there a
> need to configure link-local on R1 s1/0, and configure framerelay
> mappings?
> Without configuring the linl-local on R1, and with just a framerelay
> map global address on R3, i am able to ping from R3 to R1 and
> viceversa. Didnt see any encapsulation failed during debug ipv6 packets.
> _________________________________________________________________
> Manage multiple email accounts with Windows Live Mail effortlessly.
> http://www.get.live.com/wl/all
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sat May 09 2009 - 18:41:37 ART