Re: Need some guidance---QOS

From: sajid mavani <sajidmavani_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 7 May 2009 08:10:38 +0530

Hi Anthony,

Thanks a lot for your inputs, the link provided is very useful. As suggested
I would use the MQC way to configure it.

I would make sure that I allocate some free bandwidth for the remaning
traffic as required.

thanks once again for your time & useful guidance.

Have a pleasant evening.

Regards

Sam

On 5/7/09, Anthony Sequeira <asequeira_at_internetworkexpert.com> wrote:
>
> Use the MQC method for sure!
>
> In fact, you are going to engage in Class Based Weighted Fair Queueing here
> (CBWFQ). It just so happens that this is what the MQC was originally
> invented for!
>
> You will identify your traffic using Class Maps (Step 1), do your bandwidth
> reservations in a Policy Map (Step 2), and then assign the reservations to
> an interface in Service Policy (Step 3).
>
> Be careful, in your example - you have a 10 Mbps link, and you are doing
> bandwidth reservations for the full link bandwidth. Adjust the numbers down
> accordingly to make room for your other traffic forms, specifically router
> control traffic. Cisco tells us we should not reserve more that 75% of the
> link bandwidth.
>
> You might ask - hey - can WWW traffic use more bandwidth if it is
> available???? The answer - yes indeed!
>
> Here is a link for more details on your desired configuration:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/ios/12_0t/12_0t5/feature/guide/cbwfq.html
>
> Warmest Regards,
>
> Anthony J. Sequeira, CCIE #15626
> Senior CCIE Instructor
> http://www.InternetworkExpert.com <http://www.internetworkexpert.com/>
>
> Internetwork Expert, Inc.
> Toll Free: 877-224-8987
> Outside US: 775-826-4344
>
> Test your Core Knowledge today!
> Q: What general strategy should you follow for the classification and
> marking location in your network?
> A: Marking should be done as close to the source as possible.
> More Info:
> http://www.ciscopress.com/articles/article.asp?p=101170&seqNum=2
>
> On May 6, 2009, at 10:05 PM, sajid mavani wrote:
>
> Hello Seniors,
>>
>> Couuld you please reply to me, I am eagerly waiting for your response.
>>
>> Have a pleasant day.
>>
>>
>> Regards
>>
>> Sam
>>
>>
>> On 5/7/09, sajid mavani <sajidmavani_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> Hello Seniors,
>>>
>>> Please guide me , I need some suggestions.. I am totally confused at the
>>> momemnt.
>>>
>>> I wanted to priortize & customize ( bandwisth reservation) the traffic so
>>> that it gets limited amout of bandwidth & high priority at the time of
>>> congestion.
>>>
>>> Scenario... I have a 10 mbs link on a interface.. ( dummy scenraio)
>>>
>>> a) reserve 5 mbps for my web traffic. www
>>> b) reserve 3 mbps for my ftp traffic ftp
>>> c) reserve 2 mbps for my telnet traffic. telnet
>>> d) condition would be that i want to reserve bandwidth & do priortization
>>> together either in the legacy qos or MQC way.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> I thought of doing custom queueing with priotiozation in this manner.
>>>
>>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 1 tcp ftp.
>>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 2 tcp telnet
>>> queue-list 1 protocol ip 3 tcp www
>>>
>>>
>>> queue-list 1 queue 1 byte-count 5000 (bytes)
>>> queue-list 1 queue 2 byte-count 3000
>>> queue-list 1 queue 3 bytecount 2000
>>>
>>> I could use the priority queue 0 for traffic protization...........
>>>
>>>
>>> and than use the queue-list 1 (lowest-custom) 2 ( next to follow in
>>> sequence after queue 0 is used)
>>>
>>> kindly let me know if my configuration is correct.
>>>
>>> Please let me know how would priortize & reserve bandwidth both together
>>> in
>>> the MQC ...
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks for all your ongoing help......... group study rock :)
>>>
>>> Have a pleasant day.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards
>>>
>>> Sam
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu May 07 2009 - 08:10:38 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon Jun 01 2009 - 07:04:42 ART