AW: OT: Rumor Control: Major CCIE RS Changes - Do or Do Not

When I took my lab - back in February, the proctor in Brussels told me that
there will be many changes in R&S this year, they will go "back to the
roots" and troubleshooting should definitely play a much more important
role.
I think that is very good, furthermore this might help to kick out the
fu***ng cheaters. Troubleshooting is underestimated but in real life
everyone is dealing with it. Furthermore you can learn so much while
troubleshooting, so I think it is great to add that to the CCIE.

We will see what other changes are coming....I'm sure it will be fun :o)

regards

Roger - #23543

-----Urspr|ngliche Nachricht-----
Von: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] Im Auftrag von
Darby Weaver
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 23. April 2009 22:01
An: swm_at_emanon.com
Cc: Cisco certification
Betreff: Re: OT: Rumor Control: Major CCIE RS Changes - Do or Do Not Book
Your Lab

Well if troubleshooting is coming back to the lab - I'd say that is a good
thing. VPN's and MPLS are a given with today's technologies too - so that
is a given.

I can still see Frame hanging around for a while and maybe just being
preconfigured and worth like 0-1 points or something.

Hmm...

Have no fear, I'm not worried about the skiy falling just yet - I ate my
wheaties....and lately spinach too...

On Thu, Apr 23, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Scott Morris <swm_at_emanon.com> wrote:

> Darby - The sky isn't falling.
>
> Every program goes through rearrangements. Some places are more public
> about it than others. Sometimes rumors get out of control.
>
> Either way, they are fun to watch.
>
> Whatever anyone's perception of changes (if any) happen to be, the best
> thing to do is ask yourself "Does this make sense?". Not whether you
agree
> with something or
> not (e.g. the core technology questions), but asking whether it makes
> sense.
>
> Some of the rumors I hear about make me laugh, because they don't pass a
> simple "sanity check". Either way though, no matter what level of change,
> 5%, 10%, 30%, 80% shouldn't make any difference right here, right now.
>
> And as for a method to wipe the other vendors off the map, that by itself
> doesn't pass the sanity check. By any stretch of the imagination (e.g.
even
> if they really wanted to), smaller companies are inherently more nimble
than
> larger ones. So any of us have a much better chance of doing just fine
with
> any perceived changes in the program.
>
> The only thing that may change would be more a concern for Brad
> (CCBootcamp) than the rest of us. Trying to split hairs between Cisco
> Learning Partner and offering grey-market materials is going to become
> harder and harder. But that isn't my concern! :)
>
> Relax, sit back, and enjoy the ride! Rumors != Reality.
>
> Scott
>
>
> Darby Weaver wrote:
>
>> Ok - Fresh off the press.
>>
>> Cisco is getting ready to announce a major shift in the Cisco 360
Program.
>>
>> Some say is it posed to wipe the "Grey Market Vendors" off the map in
>> favor
>> of the "Evil" Cisco 360 Program.
>>
>>
>> Well - Maybe it's an April Fool's Joke...
>>
>> Maybe it is true.
>>
>> Either way - Be afraid...
>>
>> I think the Cisco 360 was not working out as well...
>>
>> Give me your born for 6-12 month subscription was a load of BS..
>>
>> Compared to the competition....
>>
>> Hmm?
>>
>> And the rumor further says.... The Cisco 360 Program is withdrawn...
>>
>> Going to check now.
>>
>> This is hot as horse-shit!
>>
>> Take it for what is worth.
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Fri Apr 24 2009 - 13:05:27 ART