Re: CAR conform-action continue

The value 496k makes me think CAR simply because CAR has to be a multiple of
8000 :-) I like the MQC way...

On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 3:29 PM, Paul Cosgrove <paul.cosgrove_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Bandwidth reserves a minimum amount during congestion, it does not limit
> the interface. You could use a hierarcical MQC config though:-
>
> policy-map CHILD
> class HTTP-TRAFFIC
> police 400000
> class FTP-TRAFFIC
> police 160000
>
> policy-map PARENT
> class class-default
> police 496000
> service-policy CHILD
>
> Your first example below looks ok, but the second will allow more traffic
> than you intend. For example excess HTTP traffic may be matched by the
> final line, potentially allowing 400k+496k (worst case).
>
> Paul.
>
> Joe Astorino wrote:
>
>> Does the task specify you have to use CAR? If not I think another way
>> would be just allocate bandwidth to the traffic it says to with the
>> bandwidth command in MQC and police to 496k as well.
>>
>>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: George Roman <georgeroman_at_gmail.com>
>>
>> Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:38:37 To: <ccielab_at_groupstudy.com>
>> Subject: Re: CAR conform-action continue
>>
>>
>> No One?
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 22, 2009 at 10:49 AM, George Roman <georgeroman_at_gmail.com
>> >wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>>
>>> I have the following requirement with 2 solutions in mind:
>>>
>>>
>>> Police all traffic on the interface at 496kbps but before sending allow
>>> -web traffic 400kbps (web traffic is ACL 101)
>>> -ftp 160kpps (FTP traffic is ACL102)
>>>
>>> 1. int f0/0
>>> rate-limit input 496000 62000 62000 conform-action continue exceed-action
>>> drop
>>> rate-limit input access-group 101 400000 50000 50000 conform-action
>>> transmit exceed-action drop
>>> rate-limit input access-group 102 160000 20000 20000 conform-action
>>> transmit exceed-action drop
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. interface f0/0
>>> rate-limit input access-group 101 400000 50000 50000 conform-action
>>> transmit exceed-action continue
>>> rate-limit input access-group 102 160000 20000 20000 conform-action
>>> transmit exceed-action continue
>>> rate-limit input 496000 62000 62000 conform-action transmit exceed-action
>>> drop
>>>
>>> Taken the example below and the two solutions from my understanding they
>>> should provide the same result. What do you think?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks a lot,
>>> George
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707, CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net