Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver

From: John Edom <jedom123_at_gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:08:49 +0400

Dear All,

I can use third party sfp with cisco switch using command "service
unsupported-transceiver" but i wanna know if something wrong in use of sfp
in this way? Can i encounter any problem in future and someone faced any
issue because of this forced method?

Need your comments

Best Regards
John

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Wed Apr 22 2009 - 11:08:49 ART

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Akber Ali Mirza: "Re: MPLS VPN - difficulties in last level trouble shooting"
Previous message: Salah ElShekeil: "Re: Core Knowledge - Don't mis-interpret this"
Next in thread: Kim Teu - Amitabha: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: Kim Teu - Amitabha: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: Tony Schaffran \(GS\): "RE: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: Larry Hadrava: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: ron.wilkerson_at_gmail.com: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: Brad Ellis: "RE: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: Pavel Bykov: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"
Maybe reply: John Edom: "Re: Third Party SFP - unsupported-transceiver"

Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ] [ by messages with attachments ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART