Re: Per-Port, Per-Vlan classification...

From: Bryan Bartik <bbartik_at_ipexpert.com>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:37:13 -0600

The configuration guide says you can use it on trunk or static access ports.
Trunk links make the most sense, not sure when you would use it on an access
link...maybe if it had a voice vlan.

Good luck,

Bryan Bartik
CCIE #23707, CCNP
Sr. Support Engineer - IPexpert, Inc.
URL: http://www.IPexpert.com

On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 2:55 AM, Pavel Bykov <slidersv_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> What do you mean by per-port per-vlan?
> Like when you use both methods of classification in one class?
>
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 10:15 PM, Modular <modulartx_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > I m trying to figure out in what scenario you would use per-port
> per-vlan
> > classification.?.? Wouldn t you only use it on a trunk when you want to
> >
> > rate-limit the bw of a particular vlan?
> >
> >
> >
> > Also, on the 3550, since you can use match vlan" couldn t you just
> > classify
> >
> > the vlan traffic, police it in the policy map and apply that policy map
> to
> > the
> >
> > trunk itself?
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks for the help,
> >
> > Bryan R.
> >
> >
> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
> >
> > _______________________________________________________________________
> > Subscription information may be found at:
> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Pavel Bykov
> ----------------
> Don't forget to help stopping the braindumps, use of which reduces value of
> your certifications. Sign the petition at http://www.stopbraindumps.com/
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

--
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Tue Apr 21 2009 - 20:37:13 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART