RE: A secure port cannot be a protected port

Well, that is indeed nifty. Both the 3550 and 3560 command reference say no, table says yes. Malik to test and find out? I know I have configured it before, but as Joe said, that doesn't really prove anything.

-ryan

-----Original Message-----
From: Dale Shaw [mailto:dale.shaw_at_gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 10:04 PM
To: S Malik
Cc: Ryan West; Cisco certification
Subject: Re: A secure port cannot be a protected port

The 12.2(46)SE command reference for "switchport port-security" states
"A secure port cannot be a protected port".

It's very strange, because in the "Port Security Compatibility with
Other Switch Features" table (Table 24-3) of the 12.2(46)SE
configuration guide lists "Protected port" as being compatible with
port security! This is the same table Ryan linked below.

Only one way to find out, Malik! Do let us know how you go..

cheers,
Dale

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 2:39 PM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:
> Malik,
>
> I don't think you should have any problem configuring it. I wasn't able to find the text you're referring to, but I was able to find this table for 12.2(25)SEB and 12.2(44)SE:
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swtrafc.html#wp1184775
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of S Malik
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 9:15 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: A secure port cannot be a protected port
>
> As per Cisco's documentation "A secure port cannot be a protected port",
> However, I could configure port-security & switchport protected on an
> interface on 3550 switch.
>
> Can any explain please?
>
> Thanks
> Malik

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 19 2009 - 01:15:02 ART