Re: A secure port cannot be a protected port

As per table, secure port & protected are compatible. Thanks for the
reference and to every one for taking time to answer my question.

On Sun, Apr 19, 2009 at 12:39 AM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> Malik,
>
> I don't think you should have any problem configuring it. I wasn't able to
> find the text you're referring to, but I was able to find this table for
> 12.2(25)SEB and 12.2(44)SE:
>
>
> http://www.cisco.com/en/US/docs/switches/lan/catalyst3550/software/release/12.2_44_se/configuration/guide/swtrafc.html#wp1184775
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of S
> Malik
> Sent: Saturday, April 18, 2009 9:15 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: A secure port cannot be a protected port
>
> As per Cisco's documentation "A secure port cannot be a protected port",
> However, I could configure port-security & switchport protected on an
> interface on 3550 switch.
>
> Can any explain please?
>
> Thanks
> Malik
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Sun Apr 19 2009 - 01:05:30 ART