Re: Disabling spanning tree

From: Salah ElShekeil <salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:35:18 +0300

I have this task

Assume SW2 Fa 0/15 will never connect to a switch or bridge!

desable spanning tree on this interface, you may not use no spanning-tree
commands to do this!

the interface must be up !!

!!

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ryan DeBerry <rdeberry_at_gmail.com> wrote:

> BPDUFILTER
>
> http://anetworkerblog.com/2007/08/26/bpdu-guard-and-filter/
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ravi Singh <way2ccie_at_googlemail.com>wrote:
>
>> I think disabling spanning tree is not the right term to use. You can
>> disable the receipt of BPDUs on the interface though using bpduguard.
>> or if you use portfast on the interface it would send the interface
>> straight to forwarding state which can be thought of as disabling
>> spanning-tree but actually it's not.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Ravi
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Salah ElShekeil
>> <salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>> > Dear all,
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > how to disable spanning tree on an interface without using "no spanning
>> > tree" command?
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> > Salah
>> >
>> >
>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 20:35:18 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:12 ART