Re: Disabling spanning tree

no switchport

Not sure what else it could be.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:35 PM, Salah ElShekeil
<salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> I have this task
>
> Assume SW2 Fa 0/15 will never connect to a switch or bridge!
>
> desable spanning tree on this interface, you may not use no spanning-tree
> commands to do this!
>
> the interface must be up !!
>
>
> !!
>
> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 8:32 PM, Ryan DeBerry <rdeberry_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> BPDUFILTER
>>
>> http://anetworkerblog.com/2007/08/26/bpdu-guard-and-filter/
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 1:26 PM, Ravi Singh <way2ccie_at_googlemail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> I think disabling spanning tree is not the right term to use. You can
>>> disable the receipt of BPDUs on the interface though using bpduguard.
>>> or if you use portfast on the interface it would send the interface
>>> straight to forwarding state which can be thought of as disabling
>>> spanning-tree but actually it's not.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Ravi
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 16, 2009 at 6:17 PM, Salah ElShekeil
>>> <salah.elshekeil_at_gmail.com> wrote:
>>> > Dear all,
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > how to disable spanning tree on an interface without using "no spanning
>>> > tree" command?
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Salah
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>> >
>>> > _______________________________________________________________________
>>> > Subscription information may be found at:
>>> > http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>>>
>>>
>>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________________________________
>>> Subscription information may be found at:
>>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Thu Apr 16 2009 - 13:40:54 ART