Re: OT: QOS on Signaling Traffic for Mobile operators, SIGTRAN,

From: Ahmed Elhoussiny <aelhoussiny_at_gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 14:26:58 +0200

Hello Radio,
                    Thanks , but i think if i used priority for the
signaling queue i will be using 2 queues ( Voice & signaling),
                   2 LLQs in CBWF Or to be more specified i will be using 2
priority queues on MDRR for the GSR & CRS-1

  I remember reading about this in one of my QOS references, but did it
scale well with you, did it give you the preformance for both voice &
signaling ?

The Signaling requires min delay, RTD of 50 ms & 100 ms. !!!!!

Thanks in advance.

*Ahmed Elhoussiny,CCIE # 21988*

On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 1:22 PM, Radioactive Frog <pbhatkoti_at_gmail.com>wrote:

> Normally signaling should be reserved using "bandwidth 512000' (for
> example) command and the RTP stream should be given priority using
> 'PRIORITY" command.
> I've worked on many softswtich so they may be having both RTP and Signaling
> terminated in them.
>
> As you've mentioned HLR signaling & replication - it will depend what are
> the maximum delay/requirement for that perticular protocol. If you are not
> sure about the perticular protocol behaviour then it would be safe to put
> all signaling traffic in priority queue e.g. using "priority 512000"
> command.
>
> HTH
> -frog
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 13, 2009 at 8:57 PM, Ahmed Elhoussiny <aelhoussiny_at_gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>> I'm working on a Mobile Operator project , to migrate his old
>> network to an IP/MPLS NGN .
>> While making the QOS implementation & design , i was
>> gathering the information for the traffic classification & marking.
>>
>> And guess what, the signaling traffic is requring very low RTD
>> , more than the VOICE itself, customer is requesting to give the Signaling
>> more priority that the VOICE traffic.
>>
>>
>> The signaling traffic I'm talking about is the signaling
>> between the soft-switches named SIGTRAN & the HLR signaling & replication
>> named as GDMP+GMPS
>>
>> So was thinking about having 2 LLQs.or having Both Traffic in same Queue.
>>
>> Have any one faced this before, or seen any best practise for this
>>
>> *Thanks & B.Regards
>> Ahmed Elhoussiny, CCIE # 21988 (R&S)
>> Network Consultant & Cisco Academy Instructor*
>>
>> *' Every class i teach , i learn something new myself '*
>> *http://twitter.com/aelhoussiny**
>> **www.linkedin.com/in/aelhoussiny*
>>
>>
>> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>>
>> _______________________________________________________________________
>> Subscription information may be found at:
>> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html

Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
Received on Mon Apr 13 2009 - 14:26:58 ART

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 : Mon May 04 2009 - 07:39:11 ART