Re: Doubt regarding PBR

ok i c....

thanks
raghav

On Thu, Apr 9, 2009 at 11:52 AM, Ryan West <rwest_at_zyedge.com> wrote:

> Raghav,
>
> The set interface command is designed for point to point links, so in your
> case either way should work fine. If it were multipoint interface, only the
> latter would work.
>
> -ryan
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: nobody_at_groupstudy.com [mailto:nobody_at_groupstudy.com] On Behalf Of
> Raghav Bhargava
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2009 2:46 PM
> To: Cisco certification
> Subject: Doubt regarding PBR
>
> Hi Experts,
> If the question says that for MTU size 0-100 use serial interface and for
> MTU size 101-200 use fa0/0. then what is the difference between the
> following commands under Route-map:-
>
> route-map TST permit 10
> match length 0 100
> set interface serial0/0
>
> OR
>
> set ip next-hop ( remote end ip)
>
> Just curious to know????
>
> By the way both work as I have used them in my lab...
>
> --
> Warm Regards
> Raghav
>
>
> Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net
>
> _______________________________________________________________________
> Subscription information may be found at:
> http://www.groupstudy.com/list/CCIELab.html
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>

-- 
Warm Regards
Raghav
Blogs and organic groups at http://www.ccie.net